Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
BEK 2019 144 • KG SZ BEK 2019 144 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Impairment Investigation Mandate Sustained

Numero d'incarto BEK 2019 144
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A defendant, facing criminal proceedings, appealed a public prosecutor's order concerning an investigation mandate to determine driving impairment, arguing against the basis for the order. The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the initial suspicion of impairment, based on observed driving behavior and indicators at the traffic stop, provided a sufficient legal basis to order the necessary investigative measures, including blood and urine samples, to establish the facts regarding the defendant's fitness to drive.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Impairment Investigation Mandate Sustained: The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the initial suspicion of impairment, based on observed driving behavior and indicators at the traffic stop, provided a sufficient legal basis to order the necessary investigative measures, including blood and urine samples, to establish the facts regarding the defendant's fitness to drive.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
inchiesta penale idoneità alla guida fissazione della multa motivi probatori abbandono del procedimento per infrazione stradale esame dell'alito
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Verfügung vom 17. Dezember 2019 \n BEK 2019 144 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin lic. iur. Daniela Pérez-Steiner, Gerichtsschreiber lic. iur. Mathis Bösch. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigter und Beschwerdeführer, erbeten verteidigt durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen Staatsanwaltschaft March, Postfach 162, Rathausplatz 1, 8853 Lachen, Strafverfolgungsbehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwältin C.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Untersuchungsbefehl zur Feststellung der Fahrunfähigkeit |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung der Staatsanwaltschaft March vom 29. Juli 2019, SUM 2019 1448);- \n \n \n \n hat die Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: