Creditor's Petition for Bankruptcy Upheld on Undisputed Debt
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAA company appealed a lower court's decision to open bankruptcy proceedings against it, which was initiated by a creditor. The appellate court considered the creditor's evidence demonstrating that the debt was due and undisputed, as the debtor had failed to make payments after a final demand, thus establishing the necessary condition of an unsatisfied legal claim for the declaration of bankruptcy. The court upheld the decision to open bankruptcy because the debtor failed to prove that the alleged debt was either paid, offset, or otherwise legally contested to the extent that it would preclude bankruptcy proceedings.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IACreditor's Petition for Bankruptcy Upheld on Undisputed Debt: The appellate court considered the creditor's evidence demonstrating that the debt was due and undisputed, as the debtor had failed to make payments after a final demand, thus establishing the necessary condition of an unsatisfied legal claim for the declaration of bankruptcy. The court upheld the decision to open bankruptcy because the debtor failed to prove that the alleged debt was either paid, offset, or otherwise legally contested to the extent that it would preclude bankruptcy proceedings.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IATesto completo
\n
\n
\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n \n Beschluss vom 26. Juli 2019 \n BEK 2019 107 \n \n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin lic. iur. Daniela Pérez-Steiner, Kantonsrichter Clara Betschart und Josef Reichlin. |\n
\n\n
\n \n \n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n In Sachen |\n A.________ AG, Gesuchsgegnerin und Beschwerdeführerin, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen C.________, Gesuchsteller und Beschwerdegegner, vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin D.________, |\n
\n\n
\n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Konkurseröffnung |\n \n\n
\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung des Einzelrichters am Bezirksgericht Höfe vom 27. Mai 2019, ZES 2019 200);- \n \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: