Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
BEK 2019 106 • KG SZ BEK 2019 106 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Decision to Discontinue Proceedings in Sexual Assault Case

Numero d'incarto BEK 2019 106
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Spese processuali a carico del ricorrente / reclamante

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A private litigant appealed a cantonal public prosecutor's decision to discontinue criminal proceedings concerning multiple counts of sexual acts with children and sexual coercion against several defendants. The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the public prosecutor's decision to stop the proceedings was not clearly arbitrary, as there were significant evidentiary gaps and uncertainties regarding the defendants' culpability that justified the decision not to proceed to trial, even in the face of the victim's serious allegations.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Decision to Discontinue Proceedings in Sexual Assault Case: The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the public prosecutor's decision to stop the proceedings was not clearly arbitrary, as there were significant evidentiary gaps and uncertainties regarding the defendants' culpability that justified the decision not to proceed to trial, even in the face of the victim's serious allegations.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
coazione sessuale gravi addebiti penali abbandono del procedimento penale abbandono per lesioni personali domanda di ricusazione omissione del ministero pubblico
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Beschluss vom 27. Januar 2020 \n BEK 2019 106 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin lic. iur. Daniela Pérez-Steiner, Kantonsrichter Clara Betschart und Josef Reichlin, Gerichtsschreiber lic. iur. Mathis Bösch. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________ Privatklägerin und Beschwerdeführerin, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen 1. Kantonale Staatsanwaltschaft, Postfach 75, SSB, 8836 Bennau, Strafverfolgungsbehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwältin C.________, 2. D.________ erbeten vereidigt durch Rechtsanwalt E.________, 3. F.________ erbeten verteidigt durch Rechtsanwältin G.________, 4. H.________ erbeten verteidigt durch Rechtsanwalt I.________, 5. J.________ erbeten verteidigt durch Rechtsanwalt K.________, Ziff. 2-5 Beschuldigte und Beschwerdegegner, |\n

\n\n

\n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n betreffend |\n Einstellung Strafverfahren (mehrfache sexuelle Handlungen mit Kindern und mehrfache sexuelle Nötigung) |\n

\n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung der kantonalen Staatsanwaltschaft vom 29. Mai 2019, SUB 2017 261-264);- \n