Appeal Regarding Precision of Enforceable Title for Provisional Collection
Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAAn appellant challenged a lower court's decision regarding provisional authorization to proceed to collection, asserting that the original claim document was not sufficiently precise for enforcement under the relevant debt enforcement law. The appellate court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the requirement for certainty in an enforceable title is met if the underlying legal relationship and the obligated party's performance obligation can be clearly and unambiguously determined from the document, even if some details require interpretation consistent with the document's apparent intent, thereby affirming the lower court's finding that the document provided a sufficiently clear basis for provisional enforcement.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAAppeal Regarding Precision of Enforceable Title for Provisional Collection: The appellate court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the requirement for certainty in an enforceable title is met if the underlying legal relationship and the obligated party's performance obligation can be clearly and unambiguously determined from the document, even if some details require interpretation consistent with the document's apparent intent, thereby affirming the lower court's finding that the document provided a sufficiently clear basis for provisional enforcement.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IATesto completo
\n
\n
\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n \n \n Beschluss vom 16. April 2019 \n BEK 2018 97 \n \n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident Dr. Reto Heizmann, Kantonsrichter Clara Betschart und Josef Reichlin, Gerichtsschreiberin lic. iur. Gabriela Thurnherr, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin MLaw Rebecca Winnewisser. |\n
\n\n
\n \n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Gesuchsgegner und Beschwerdeführer, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen 1. C.________, Gesuchstellerin und Beschwerdegegnerin, 2. D.________, Gesuchsteller und Beschwerdegegner, beide vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt E.________, |\n
\n|\n betreffend |\n provisorische Rechtsöffnung |\n \n\n
\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung des Einzelrichters am Bezirksgericht Schwyz vom 22. Mai 2018, ZES 2018 190);- \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: