Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2018 95 • KG SZ BEK 2018 95 Generato dall'IA

Public Prosecutor's Authority to Issue Search and Seizure Orders

Numero d'incarto BEK 2018 95
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A defendant appealed a search and seizure order issued by the public prosecutor's office, challenging the lawfulness of the order for having been issued without proper judicial review of the underlying facts necessary to justify the intrusive measure. The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the public prosecutor's office, acting as the preliminary investigation authority, possesses the legal competence to issue such orders when necessary for criminal proceedings, and the procedural requirements for the issuance were sufficiently met, thus upholding the validity of the search and seizure order.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Public Prosecutor's Authority to Issue Search and Seizure Orders: The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the public prosecutor's office, acting as the preliminary investigation authority, possesses the legal competence to issue such orders when necessary for criminal proceedings, and the procedural requirements for the issuance were sufficiently met, thus upholding the validity of the search and seizure order.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
inchiesta penale ordine del pignoramento poteri pubblici sindacato giurisdizionale ammissione del pubblico ministero sequestro di documenti Durchsuchungs- und Beschlagnahmebefehl | Zwangsmassnahmen/Beschlagnahme
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2018 72
Public Prosecutor v. Appellant: Legality of Search and Seizure
BEK 2017 75
Challenge to Search and Seizure Order Legality
BEK 2021 39
Prosecutor's Order Authorization Upheld in Seizure of Evidence
BEK 2019 193
Prosecutor's Seizure Order Upheld on Appeal
BEK 2024 206
Appeal Against Prosecutor's Seizure Order

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Verfügung vom 16. August 2018 \n BEK 2018 95 \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident Dr. Reto Heizmann. |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigter und Beschwerdeführer, gegen Staatsanwaltschaft March, Postfach 162, Rathausplatz 1, 8853 Lachen, Anklagebehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwalt B.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Durchsuchungsund Beschlagnahmebefehl |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen den Durchsuchungsund Beschlagnahmebefehl der Staatsanwaltschaft March vom 11. Juni 2018, SUM 2018 1023);-

\n \n \n \n hat der Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident, \n