Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2018 93 • KG SZ BEK 2018 93 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Regarding Health Ordinance and Medicinal Products Act Violations

Numero d'incarto BEK 2018 93
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involves an appeal by a defendant against a lower court's judgment concerning violations of the Health Ordinance and the Medicinal Products Act. The core facts relate to the defendant's conduct under these specific health regulations, but the specific details of the alleged violation are omitted in the provided excerpt, which only sets the stage for the appeal. The court's reasoning for its ultimate verdict, which stems from this appeal, is not detailed in this introductory section, which merely identifies the parties and the subject matter of the appeal.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal Regarding Health Ordinance and Medicinal Products Act Violations: The core facts relate to the defendant's conduct under these specific health regulations, but the specific details of the alleged violation are omitted in the provided excerpt, which only sets the stage for the appeal. The court's reasoning for its ultimate verdict, which stems from this appeal, is not detailed in this introductory section, which merely identifies the parties and the subject matter of the appeal.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
medicinali motivi di salute ricorso per inadempienza interpretazione delle leggi legislazione sanitaria sindacato giurisdizionale
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2022 18
Appeal of Conviction Under Health Ordinance and Medicinal Products Act
BEK 2020 17
Federal Act on Therapeutic Products Violations Appeal
III 2020 198
Appeal Regarding Provision of Medical Care
BEK 2024 71
Appeal of COVID Ordinance and Official Order Violations
STK 2022 29
Appeal Regarding Narcotics, Employment, and Residency Violations

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n Urteil vom 8. Juni 2020 \n BEK 2018 93 \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin lic. iur. Daniela Pérez-Steiner, Kantonsrichter Josef Reichlin und Bettina Krienbühl, Gerichtsschreiberin lic. iur. Antoinette Hürlimann. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigter und Berufungsführer, erbeten verteidigt durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen Staatsanwaltschaft Innerschwyz, Postfach 562, Schmiedgasse 21, 6431 Schwyz, Anklagebehörde und Berufungsgegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwältin C.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Widerhandlung gegen die Gesundheitsverordnung (aGesV) und das Heilmittelgesetz (HMG) |\n \n\n

\n (Berufung gegen das Urteil der Einzelrichterin am Bezirksgericht Schwyz vom 28. Februar 2018, SEO 2014 34);- \n \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben: