Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
BEK 2018 90 • KG SZ BEK 2018 90 Generato dall'IA

Prosecutor's Discretion Upheld in Breach of Trust Dismissal Appeal

Numero d'incarto BEK 2018 90
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The private parties appealed a public prosecutor's decision to discontinue criminal proceedings against an accused for breach of trust, arguing the decision was unfounded because the initial investigation provided sufficient evidence of criminal conduct related to financial mismanagement. The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the prosecutor's decision was permissible because the evidence gathered during the preliminary investigation did not clearly establish the objective elements of the alleged offense, specifically failing to definitively prove the accused acted contrary to their duties to the detriment of the estate, thus affirming the prosecutor's authority to terminate proceedings when a conviction is not sufficiently likely.

Regesto Legislator

Ufficiale

Einstellung Strafverfahren, ungetreue Geschäftsbesorgung (Art. 158 Ziff. 2 StGB), evtl. Veruntreuung (Art. 138 Ziff.1 Abs. 2 StGB); 2. Rechtsgang | Einstellung Strafverfahren

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
doveri del ministero pubblico violazione del dovere trust direzione del processo inchiesta penale abbandono del procedimento penale

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 358 Abs. 2 StPO

The court used this article to dismiss the appeal filed by the private prosecutors.

Art. 426 Abs. 1 StPO

The court applied this article regarding the costs of the appeal proceedings.

Art. 426 Abs. 2 StPO

The court applied this article regarding the assignment of court costs to the private prosecutors.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Beschluss vom 14. August 2018 \n BEK 2018 90 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin lic. iur. Daniela Pérez-Steiner, Kantonsrichter Clara Betschart und Josef Reichlin, Gerichtsschreiber lic. iur. Mathis Bösch. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________ und B.________, Privatkläger und Beschwerdeführer, gegen 1. Staatsanwaltschaft Höfe Einsiedeln, Postfach 128, 8832 Wollerau, Strafverfolgungsbehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwältin C.________, 2. D.________, Beschuldigter und Beschwerdegegner, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | \n betreffend · \n Einstellung Strafverfahren, ungetreue Geschäftsbesorgung (