Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
BEK 2018 87 • KG SZ BEK 2018 87 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Regarding Definitive Execution Authorization in Debt Enforcement

Numero d'incarto BEK 2018 87
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case concerns an appeal against a lower court's decision granting definitive execution authorization (definitive Rechtsöffnung) in a debt enforcement matter. The appellant challenged the authorization, which was based on an established debt instrument. The appellate court upheld the lower court's decision, reasoning that the documentation presented sufficiently established the existence, due date, and exact amount of the undisputed debt, thereby satisfying the legal requirements for granting definitive execution authorization under the relevant enforcement law provisions.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal Regarding Definitive Execution Authorization in Debt Enforcement: The appellant challenged the authorization, which was based on an established debt instrument. The appellate court upheld the lower court's decision, reasoning that the documentation presented sufficiently established the existence, due date, and exact amount of the undisputed debt, thereby satisfying the legal requirements for granting definitive execution authorization under the relevant enforcement law provisions.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
esecuzione per debiti procedimento pregiudiziale d'urgenza domanda di continuazione dell'esecuzione precetto esecutivo lavoro sottoposto ad autorizzazione sentenze interpretative definitive Rechtsöffnung | Rechtsöffnung definitive
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Beschluss vom 6. September 2018 \n BEK 2018 87 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin lic. iur. Daniela Pérez-Steiner, Kantonsrichter Clara Betschart und Josef Reichlin, Gerichtsschreiber lic. iur. Mathis Bösch, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin M.A. HSG Melanie von Rickenbach. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Gesuchsgegner und Beschwerdeführer, vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin B.________, gegen C.________, Gesuchstellerin und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin D.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n definitive Rechtsöffnung |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen den Entscheid des Bezirksgerichts Einsiedeln vom 1. Juni 2018, ZES 2018 122);- \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: