Appeal Regarding Definitive Execution Authorization in Debt Enforcement
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe case concerns an appeal against a lower court's decision granting definitive execution authorization (definitive Rechtsöffnung) in a debt enforcement matter. The appellant challenged the authorization, which was based on an established debt instrument. The appellate court upheld the lower court's decision, reasoning that the documentation presented sufficiently established the existence, due date, and exact amount of the undisputed debt, thereby satisfying the legal requirements for granting definitive execution authorization under the relevant enforcement law provisions.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAAppeal Regarding Definitive Execution Authorization in Debt Enforcement: The appellant challenged the authorization, which was based on an established debt instrument. The appellate court upheld the lower court's decision, reasoning that the documentation presented sufficiently established the existence, due date, and exact amount of the undisputed debt, thereby satisfying the legal requirements for granting definitive execution authorization under the relevant enforcement law provisions.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IATesto completo
\n
\n
\n
\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n \n Beschluss vom 6. September 2018 \n BEK 2018 87 \n \n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin lic. iur. Daniela Pérez-Steiner, Kantonsrichter Clara Betschart und Josef Reichlin, Gerichtsschreiber lic. iur. Mathis Bösch, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin M.A. HSG Melanie von Rickenbach. |\n
\n\n
\n \n \n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Gesuchsgegner und Beschwerdeführer, vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin B.________, gegen C.________, Gesuchstellerin und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin D.________, |\n
\n\n
\n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n definitive Rechtsöffnung |\n \n\n
\n (Beschwerde gegen den Entscheid des Bezirksgerichts Einsiedeln vom 1. Juni 2018, ZES 2018 122);- \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: