Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2018 8 • KG SZ BEK 2018 8 Generato dall'IA

Appeal of Prosecutor's Decision Not to Initiate Criminal Proceedings

Numero d'incarto BEK 2018 8
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involves private plaintiffs appealing a prosecutor's decision not to initiate criminal proceedings against a defendant for alleged official misconduct, breach of trust, forgery, and racial discrimination, stemming from an initial non-prosecution order. The court reviewed the appeal against the decision of non-initiation, considering the grounds presented by the private plaintiffs challenging the prosecutor's determination that the alleged facts did not constitute grounds for criminal prosecution.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal of Prosecutor's Decision Not to Initiate Criminal Proceedings: The court reviewed the appeal against the decision of non-initiation, considering the grounds presented by the private plaintiffs challenging the prosecutor's determination that the alleged facts did not constitute grounds for criminal prosecution.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
azione penale privata procedimento per falsità difetto di legittimazione del ministero pubblico motivo di revisione decisione di non sollevare obiezioni domanda di ricusazione
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2019 47
Appeal of Prosecutor's Refusal to Initiate Criminal Proceedings for Misconduct and Discrimination
BEK 2022 22
Appeal Against Prosecutor's Decision Not to Commence Criminal Proceedings
BEK 2023 114
Plaintiff v. Prosecutor on Non-Initiation of Criminal Proceedings
BEK 2021 153
Appeal of Prosecutor's Decision Not to Institute Criminal Proceedings
BEK 2024 8
Appeal of Prosecutor's Decision Not to Initiate Criminal Proceedings

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Verfügung vom 20. Februar 2018 \n BEK 2018 8 \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Dr. Urs Tschümperlin. |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n 1. A.________, Privatkläger und Beschwerdeführer, 2. B.________, Privatklägerin und Beschwerdeführerin, 3. C.________, neu firmierend: D.________, Privatklägerin und Beschwerdeführerin, gegen 1. Kantonale Staatsanwaltschaft, Postfach 75, Sicherheitsstützpunkt Biberbrugg, 8836 Bennau, Strafverfolgungsbehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwältin E.________, 2. F.________, Beschuldigter und Beschwerdegegner, |\n

\n|\n betreffend |\n Nichtanhandnahme (Amtsmissbrauch, ungetreue Amtsführung, Urkundenfälschung, Rassendiskriminierung) |\n

\n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Nichtanhandnahmeverfügung der kantonalen Staatsanwaltschaft vom 3. Januar 2018, SUB 2017 416);-

\n \n \n \n hat der Kantonsgerichtspräsident, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: