Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2018 72 • KG SZ BEK 2018 72 Generato dall'IA

Public Prosecutor v. Appellant: Legality of Search and Seizure

Numero d'incarto BEK 2018 72
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The appellant challenged a search and seizure order issued by the Public Prosecutor's Office, which was based on preliminary investigation findings suggesting the involvement of the appellant in a criminal matter. The Court of Appeals reviewed the legality of the initial order and subsequent evidence seizure, ultimately upholding the prosecutor's decision because the factual basis presented provided sufficient objective grounds to suspect the appellant's involvement in the alleged offense, thereby justifying the investigative measure as proportionate and legally sound under the circumstances.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Public Prosecutor v. Appellant: Legality of Search and Seizure: The Court of Appeals reviewed the legality of the initial order and subsequent evidence seizure, ultimately upholding the prosecutor's decision because the factual basis presented provided sufficient objective grounds to suspect the appellant's involvement in the alleged offense, thereby justifying the investigative measure as proportionate and legally sound under the circumstances.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
sequestro di mezzi di prova motivazione di fatto infrazione ragione di polizia riscontri oggettivi ammissione del pubblico ministero Durchsuchungs- und Beschlagnahmebefehl | Zwangsmassnahmen/Beschlagnahme
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2018 95
Public Prosecutor's Authority to Issue Search and Seizure Orders
BEK 2017 75
Challenge to Search and Seizure Order Legality
BEK 2021 39
Prosecutor's Order Authorization Upheld in Seizure of Evidence
BEK 2019 193
Prosecutor's Seizure Order Upheld on Appeal
BEK 2019 121
Complainant v. State Prosecutor (Search and Seizure Justification)

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Beschluss vom 8. Oktober 2018 \n BEK 2018 72 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Dr. Urs Tschümperlin, Kantonsrichter Clara Betschart und Josef Reichlin, Gerichtsschreiber lic. iur. Mathis Bösch. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigter und Beschwerdeführer, amtlich verteidigt durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen Staatsanwaltschaft Innerschwyz, Postfach 562, 6431 Schwyz, Strafverfolgungsbehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwalt C.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Durchsuchungsund Beschlagnahmebefehl |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung der Staatsanwaltschaft Innerschwyz vom 26. April 2018, SUI 2018 1572);- \n \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: