Appeal Regarding Definitive Debt Clearance for Unsigned Invoice
Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAAn appellant challenged a lower court's decision granting definitive debt clearance concerning a claim arising from a commercial relationship, where the underlying debt instrument was an invoice that lacked the legally required signature for full executory power. The appellate court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that while the initial refusal of definitive clearance based solely on the unsigned invoice was correct, the lower court appropriately converted the debt enforcement procedure into an ordinary debt enforcement proceeding, as the existence of the debt was not wholly unsubstantiated and the matter required further factual determination beyond the summary enforcement process.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAAppeal Regarding Definitive Debt Clearance for Unsigned Invoice: The appellate court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that while the initial refusal of definitive clearance based solely on the unsigned invoice was correct, the lower court appropriately converted the debt enforcement procedure into an ordinary debt enforcement proceeding, as the existence of the debt was not wholly unsubstantiated and the matter required further factual determination beyond the summary enforcement process.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IATesto completo
\n
\n
\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n \n Verfügung vom 25. Mai 2018 \n BEK 2018 68 \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin lic. iur. Daniela Pérez-Steiner. |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Gesuchsgegner und Beschwerdeführer, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen C.________, Gesuchstellerin und Beschwerdegegnerin, \n vertreten durch D.________, |\n
\n\n
\n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n definitive Rechtsöffnung |\n \n\n
\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung des Einzelrichters am Bezirksgericht Schwyz vom 16. April 2018, ZES 2018 31);- \n \n \n \n hat die Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: