Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2018 66 • KG SZ BEK 2018 66 Generato dall'IA

State v. [Appellant Name] (Identification Procedures Challenge)

Numero d'incarto BEK 2018 66
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The appellant challenged a lower court order compelling his recording for identification purposes and the collection of a DNA sample following criminal proceedings. The court reviewed the matter and determined that the challenged order for identification measures, including DNA profiling, was lawful because the requirements for such coercive measures under criminal procedure law were met, specifically noting the existence of sufficient suspicion and the proportionality of the measures relative to the gravity of the suspected offense and the need for evidence preservation and criminal investigation purposes.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

State v. [Appellant Name] (Identification Procedures Challenge): The court reviewed the matter and determined that the challenged order for identification measures, including DNA profiling, was lawful because the requirements for such coercive measures under criminal procedure law were met, specifically noting the existence of sufficient suspicion and the proportionality of the measures relative to the gravity of the suspected offense and the need for evidence preservation and criminal investigation purposes.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
procedura di identificazione inchiesta penale misure coercitive procedure di ricorso obbligo d'identificazione prova del DNA
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2018 151
Prosecutor's Order for DNA Profile Upheld Against Appellant
BEK 2023 30
Appellant Challenges DNA Profiling Order Due to Insufficient Justification
BEK 2023 146
Prosecutor v. Accused (DNA Profile Order Appeal)
BEK 2021 67
Appeal Against Order Authorizing DNA Profile Creation
BEK 2020 116
Appeal Regarding Authorization for DNA Collection Based on Insufficient Suspicion

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Beschluss vom 12. September 2018 \n BEK 2018 66 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin lic. iur. Daniela Pérez-Steiner, Kantonsrichter Clara Betschart und Josef Reichlin, Gerichtsschreiberin lic. iur. Gabriela Thurnherr. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigter und Beschwerdeführer, \n gesetzlich vertreten durch B.________, |\n \n\n

\n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Erkennungsdienstliche Erfassung, Anordnung und Auftrag zur DNA-Profilerstellung |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung der Jugendanwaltschaft des Kantons Schwyz vom 17. April 2018, SUJ 2018 85);- \n \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: