Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2018 60 • KG SZ BEK 2018 60 Generato dall'IA

Appeal of Disobedience to Official Order Conviction

Numero d'incarto BEK 2018 60
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involves an appeal against a lower court's judgment concerning disobedience to an official order, where the appellant was found guilty of this offense. The appellate court reviewed the decision regarding the disobedience, which implies a dispute over the factual basis or legal assessment of failing to comply with a mandatory administrative directive, ultimately upholding or overturning the initial finding of guilt based on its interpretation of the evidence and applicable law concerning the alleged breach of the official order.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal of Disobedience to Official Order Conviction: The appellate court reviewed the decision regarding the disobedience, which implies a dispute over the factual basis or legal assessment of failing to comply with a mandatory administrative directive, ultimately upholding or overturning the initial finding of guilt based on its interpretation of the evidence and applicable law concerning the alleged breach of the official order.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
disobbedienza alla decisione dell'autorità interpretazione della sentenza base fattuale decisione penale infrazione amministrativa presentazione dinnanzi all'autorità Ungehorsam gegen eine amtliche Verfügung | Strafgesetzbuch
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2019 133
Affirmation of Disobedience Conviction
BEK 2023 104
Appellant v. State: Upholding Conviction for Disobedience and Traffic Violations
BEK 2021 21
Appeal Against Dismissal of Untimely Objection to Penal Order
ZK2 2025 2
Appeal of Enforcement Proceedings Order
BEK 2017 199
Disobedience to Orders and Denial of Legal Aid in Custody Dispute

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n Urteil vom 13. Dezember 2018 \n BEK 2018 60 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident Dr. Reto Heizmann, Kantonsrichter Clara Betschart und Josef Reichlin, Gerichtsschreiber lic. iur. Mathis Bösch, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin MLaw Sonja Mango-Meier. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigter und Berufungsführer, gegen Staatsanwaltschaft Innerschwyz, Postfach 562, 6431 Schwyz, Anklagebehörde und Berufungsgegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwalt B.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Ungehorsam gegen eine amtliche Verfügung |\n \n\n

\n (Berufung gegen das Urteil der Einzelrichterin am Bezirksgericht Schwyz vom 1. Februar 2018, SEO 2017 14);- \n \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben: