Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2018 6 • KG SZ BEK 2018 6 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Dismissal of Criminal Proceedings for Abuse of Office and Other Charges

Numero d'incarto BEK 2018 6
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The complainants appealed a decision by the cantonal public prosecutor's office to dismiss criminal proceedings concerning allegations including abuse of office, breach of trust, forgery, coercion, threat, and racial discrimination. The court dismissed the appeal, finding that the prosecutor's decision not to prosecute was legally sound because the factual basis presented by the complainants did not meet the necessary threshold for criminal charges, thus affirming the non-commencement order.

Regesto Legislator

Ufficiale

Nichtanhandnahme (Amtsmissbrauch, ungetreue Amtsführung, Urkundenfälschung, Erschleichen einer falschen Beurkundung, üble Nachrede, Verleumdung, Nötigung, Drohung und Rassendiskriminierung) | Nichtanhandnahme Strafverfahren

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
violazione dell'ordine pubblico minaccia procedimento per falsità coazione penale ricusazione del pubblico ministero accuse di abuso

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 93 Abs. 1 lit. a StPO
The appeal was dismissed on the grounds that the decision not to proceed was not appealable under this provision.
Art. 426 Abs. 1 StPO
The appeal was declared inadmissible based on this procedural provision regarding the decision not to prosecute.
Art. 66 Abs. 1 StPO
The appellants were ordered to pay the court costs.
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2018 11
Appeal Against Non-Prosecution Decision for Abuse of Office and Other Offenses
BEK 2019 72
Complainant v. Cantonal Prosecutor's Office (Criminal Proceedings Dismissal Appeal)
BEK 2018 28
Appeal Against Discontinuation of Criminal Proceedings Dismissed
BEK 2020 120
Appeal Against Decision to Discontinue Criminal Proceedings
BEK 2022 5
Appeal Against Dismissal of Misconduct Proceedings

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 93 Abs. 1 lit. a StPO

The appeal was dismissed on the grounds that the decision not to proceed was not appealable under this provision.

Art. 426 Abs. 1 StPO

The appeal was declared inadmissible based on this procedural provision regarding the decision not to prosecute.

Art. 66 Abs. 1 StPO

The appellants were ordered to pay the court costs.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Verfügung vom 19. Februar 2018 \n BEK 2018 6 \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Dr. Urs Tschümperlin. |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n 1. A.________, Privatkläger und Beschwerdeführer, 2. B.________, Beschwerdeführerin, 3. C.________, neu firmierend: D.________, Beschwerdeführerin, gegen 1. Kantonale Staatsanwaltschaft, Postfach 75, Sicherheitsstützpunkt Biberbrugg, 8836 Bennau, Strafverfolgungsbehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwältin E.________, 2. F.________, Beschuldigter und Beschwerdegegner, 3. G.________, Beschuldigter und Beschwerdegegner, 4. H.________, Beschuldigter und Beschwerdegegner, 5. I.________, Beschuldigter und Beschwerdegegner, 6. J.________, Beschuldigter und Beschwerdegegner, 7. K.________, Beschuldigter und Beschwerdegegner, 8. L.________, Beschuldigte und Beschwerdegegnerin, 9. M.________, Beschuldigter und Beschwerdegegner, |\n

\n|\n |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n betreffend |\n Nichtanhandnahme (Amtsmissbrauch, ungetreue Amtsführung, Urkundenfälschung, Erschleichen einer falschen Beurkundung, üble Nachrede, Verleumdung, Nötigung, Drohung und Rassendiskriminierung) |\n

\n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Nichtanhandnahmeverfügung der kantonalen Staatsanwaltschaft vom 3. Januar 2018, SUB 2017 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36);-

\n \n \n \n hat der Kantonsgerichtspräsident, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: