Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2018 52 • KG SZ BEK 2018 52 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Regarding Denial of Official Defense Counsel

Numero d'incarto BEK 2018 52
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The accused appealed a decision by the Cantonal Public Prosecutor's Office denying a request for official defense counsel in relation to criminal proceedings. The court considered the relevant statutory provisions governing the assignment of official defense counsel, which typically requires a minimum standard of complexity or the accused's inability to adequately defend themselves, and determined that the circumstances presented did not meet the legal threshold for appointing a defense lawyer at public expense, thus affirming the prosecutor's rejection of the request.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal Regarding Denial of Official Defense Counsel: The court considered the relevant statutory provisions governing the assignment of official defense counsel, which typically requires a minimum standard of complexity or the accused's inability to adequately defend themselves, and determined that the circumstances presented did not meet the legal threshold for appointing a defense lawyer at public expense, thus affirming the prosecutor's rejection of the request.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
difesa d'ufficio pubblico ufficiale complessità della procedura omissione del ministero pubblico diritti della difesa omissione del difensore amtliche Verteidigung | UP/amtliche Verteidigung
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2018 168
Appeal Against Denial of Official Defense Counsel
BEK 2017 58
Appellant v. Cantonal Prosecutor's Office (Mandatory Defense Counsel Appointment)
BEK 2019 146
Appeal Regarding Denial of Publicly Funded Legal Representation in Criminal Proceedings
BEK 2017 80
Prosecutorial Appointment of Defense Counsel Premature
BEK 2022 114
Defendant v. Prosecutor on Appointment of Defense Counsel

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Verfügung vom 28. Mai 2018 \n BEK 2018 52 \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident Dr. Reto Heizmann. |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigter und Beschwerdeführer, gegen Kantonale Staatsanwaltschaft, Postfach 75, Sicherheitsstützpunkt Biberbrugg, 8836 Bennau, Anklagebehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwältin B.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n amtliche Verteidigung |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung der kantonalen Staatsanwaltschaft vom 22. März 2018, SUB 2015 243);- \n \n \n \n hat der Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: