Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
BEK 2018 50 • KG SZ BEK 2018 50 Generato dall'IA

Private Complainants' Appeal on Party Status in Severed Criminal Proceedings

Numero d'incarto BEK 2018 50
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Two private complainants appealed a prosecutor's decision to sever proceedings, arguing for their status as parties in the criminal case against the accused. The court considered the statutory requirements for party status in criminal proceedings, specifically concerning private complainants, and determined that given the nature of the case and the stage of the proceedings, the complainants did not meet the necessary criteria to maintain full party status throughout the entire separated process against the accused.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 lit. a OG; Private Complainants' Appeal on Party Status in Severed Criminal Proceedings: The court considered the statutory requirements for party status in criminal proceedings, specifically concerning private complainants, and determined that given the nature of the case and the stage of the proceedings, the complainants did not meet the necessary criteria to maintain full party status throughout the entire separated process against the accused.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
parte al procedimento azione penale privata denuncia penale difetto di legittimazione del ministero pubblico requisito legale azione di separazione

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 lit. a OG
The appeal is declared inadmissible based on this provision.
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 lit. a OG

The appeal is declared inadmissible based on this provision.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n Verfügung vom 7. September 2018 \n BEK 2018 50 \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Dr. Urs Tschümperlin, Gerichtsschreiber lic. iur. Mathis Bösch. |\n \n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n 1. A.________, 2. B.________, Privatkläger und Beschwerdeführer, beide gesetzlich vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin C.________, gegen 1. D.________, Beschuldigter und Beschwerdegegner, erbeten verteidigt durch Rechtsanwalt E.________, 2. Kantonale Staatsanwaltschaft, Postfach 75, SSB, 8836 Bennau, Strafverfolgungsbehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwalt F.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Verfahrenstrennung, Parteistellung |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen das Schreiben der kantonalen Staatsanwaltschaft vom 15. März 2018, SUB 2017 479);- \n \n \n \n hat der Kantonsgerichtspräsident, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: