Private Complainants' Appeal on Party Status in Severed Criminal Proceedings
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IATwo private complainants appealed a prosecutor's decision to sever proceedings, arguing for their status as parties in the criminal case against the accused. The court considered the statutory requirements for party status in criminal proceedings, specifically concerning private complainants, and determined that given the nature of the case and the stage of the proceedings, the complainants did not meet the necessary criteria to maintain full party status throughout the entire separated process against the accused.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAArt. 66 Abs. 1 lit. a OG; Private Complainants' Appeal on Party Status in Severed Criminal Proceedings: The court considered the statutory requirements for party status in criminal proceedings, specifically concerning private complainants, and determined that given the nature of the case and the stage of the proceedings, the complainants did not meet the necessary criteria to maintain full party status throughout the entire separated process against the accused.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IAQuestioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe appeal is declared inadmissible based on this provision.
Testo completo
\n
\n
\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n Verfügung vom 7. September 2018 \n BEK 2018 50 \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Dr. Urs Tschümperlin, Gerichtsschreiber lic. iur. Mathis Bösch. |\n \n\n
\n \n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n In Sachen |\n 1. A.________, 2. B.________, Privatkläger und Beschwerdeführer, beide gesetzlich vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin C.________, gegen 1. D.________, Beschuldigter und Beschwerdegegner, erbeten verteidigt durch Rechtsanwalt E.________, 2. Kantonale Staatsanwaltschaft, Postfach 75, SSB, 8836 Bennau, Strafverfolgungsbehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwalt F.________, |\n
\n\n
\n \n
\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Verfahrenstrennung, Parteistellung |\n \n\n
\n (Beschwerde gegen das Schreiben der kantonalen Staatsanwaltschaft vom 15. März 2018, SUB 2017 479);- \n \n \n \n hat der Kantonsgerichtspräsident, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: