Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2018 5 • KG SZ BEK 2018 5 Generato dall'IA

Challenge to Prosecutor's Refusal to Initiate Criminal Proceedings for Official Misconduct

Numero d'incarto BEK 2018 5
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involves a complaint against a public prosecutor's decision not to initiate criminal proceedings regarding allegations of official misconduct, breach of trust, forgery, and obtaining a false certification. The complainants sought to overturn the public prosecutor's decision to dismiss the investigation into the accused parties. The court upheld the public prosecutor's decision not to proceed, reasoning that the factual allegations presented by the complainants did not meet the threshold required to establish a prima facie case for the specific criminal offenses charged, thus justifying the decision to refrain from opening a formal criminal investigation.

Regesto Legislator

Ufficiale

Nichtanhandnahme (Amtsmissbrauch, ungetreue Amtsführung, Urkundenfälschung, Erschleichen einer falschen Beurkundung) | Nichtanhandnahme Strafverfahren

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
denuncia penale omissione del ministero pubblico apertura della procedura funzionario pubblico procedimento per falsità mancanza di prova

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 93 BGG
The appeal was declared inadmissible based on this procedural rule.
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
The costs of the appeal were imposed according to this provision.
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2024 76
Appeal Against Prosecutor's Refusal to Initiate Criminal Proceedings
BEK 2018 184
Appeal Against Prosecutor's Refusal to Prosecute Official Misconduct
BEK 2024 44
Appeal Against Prosecutor's Refusal to Initiate Criminal Proceedings
BEK 2018 183
Appeal Against Refusal to Prosecute for Official Misconduct
BEK 2023 85
Complainant Appeal of Prosecutor's Refusal to Initiate Proceedings Upheld

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 93 BGG

The appeal was declared inadmissible based on this procedural rule.

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The costs of the appeal were imposed according to this provision.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Verfügung vom 16. Februar 2018 \n BEK 2018 5 \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Dr. Urs Tschümperlin. |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n 1. A.________, Privatkläger und Beschwerdeführer, 2. B.________, Beschwerdeführerin, 3. C.________ neu firmierend: D.________, Beschwerdeführerin, gegen 1. Kantonale Staatsanwaltschaft, Postfach 75, Sicherheitsstützpunkt Biberbrugg, 8836 Bennau, Strafverfolgungsbehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwältin E.________, 2. F.________, Beschuldigte und Beschwerdegegnerin, 3. I.________, Beschuldigter und Beschwerdegegner, 4. G.________, Beschuldigter und Beschwerdegegner, 5. H.________, Beschuldigter und Beschwerdegegner, |\n

\n|\n |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n betreffend |\n Nichtanhandnahme (Amtsmissbrauch, ungetreue Amtsführung, Urkundenfälschung, Erschleichen einer falschen Beurkundung) |\n

\n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Nichtanhandnahmeverfügung der kantonalen Staatsanwaltschaft vom 3. Januar 2018, SUB 2017 21, 22, 23 ,24);-

\n \n \n \n hat der Kantonsgerichtspräsident, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: