Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2018 47 • KG SZ BEK 2018 47 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Decision to Discontinue Embezzlement Proceedings

Numero d'incarto BEK 2018 47
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The appeal concerns a prosecutor's decision to discontinue criminal proceedings related to alleged embezzlement. The appealing party challenged this decision, arguing the preliminary investigation uncovered sufficient evidence to proceed. The court, however, upheld the prosecutor's decision because the evidence presented did not meet the threshold necessary to establish a well-founded suspicion of the charged offense, thus justifying the decision not to pursue charges.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Decision to Discontinue Embezzlement Proceedings: The appealing party challenged this decision, arguing the preliminary investigation uncovered sufficient evidence to proceed. The court, however, upheld the prosecutor's decision because the evidence presented did not meet the threshold necessary to establish a well-founded suspicion of the charged offense, thus justifying the decision not to pursue charges.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
istruzione penale per appropriazione indebita abbandono del procedimento penale infrazione procedure connesse decisione pregiudiziale principio di opportunità Nichtanhandnahme (Veruntreuung) | Nichtanhandnahme Strafverfahren
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2020 69
Appeal Against Decision to Discontinue Embezzlement Proceedings
BEK 2024 201
Appeal Against Discontinuation of Criminal Proceedings
BEK 2021 85
Appeal of Decision to Discontinue Criminal Proceedings
BEK 2023 134
Appellate Court Decision on Embezzlement Prosecution Discontinuation
BEK 2022 184
Appeal of Discontinuation of Criminal Proceedings

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Verfügung vom 20. Juli 2018 \n BEK 2018 47 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin lic. iur. Daniela Pérez-Steiner, Gerichtsschreiber lic. iur. Mathis Bösch. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschwerdeführer, gegen 1. Kantonale Staatsanwaltschaft, Postfach 75, SSB, 8836 Bennau, Strafverfolgungsbehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwältin B.________, 2. C.________, Beschuldigte und Beschwerdegegnerin, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Nichtanhandnahme (Veruntreuung) |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung der kantonalen Staatsanwaltschaft vom 22. Februar 2018, SUB 2017 646);- \n \n \n \n hat die Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: