Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2018 46 • KG SZ BEK 2018 46 Generato dall'IA

Motion for Recusal Based on Prior Administrative Action Denied

Numero d'incarto BEK 2018 46
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A defendant filed a motion seeking the recusal of a judicial authority in a criminal proceeding, asserting that a prior, separate administrative act involving the same prosecutor demonstrated a bias that compromised the judge's impartiality. The court considered the defendant's argument that the judge's involvement in a prior related matter created a conflict of interest, but ultimately denied the motion, reasoning that the prior administrative decision was distinct from the current criminal case and did not establish a relationship or circumstance that would objectively justify the judge's disqualification under the relevant legal standards for impartiality.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Motion for Recusal Based on Prior Administrative Action Denied: The court considered the defendant's argument that the judge's involvement in a prior related matter created a conflict of interest, but ultimately denied the motion, reasoning that the prior administrative decision was distinct from the current criminal case and did not establish a relationship or circumstance that would objectively justify the judge's disqualification under the relevant legal standards for impartiality.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
domanda di ricusazione parzialità del giudice autorità amministrativa ricorso per annullamento nel diritto dell'Unione domanda di riesame amministrativo conflitto d'interessi Ausstand | Ausstandsbegehren
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2025 29
Petitioner's Motion for Judicial Recusal Denied
BEK 2021 144
Motion for Judicial Recusal Denied Due to Prior Unfavorable Rulings
BEK 2023 126
Motion for Judicial Recusal Denied
BEK 2022 99
Denial of Motion for Judicial Recusal Based on Prior Rulings
BEK 2024 139
Applicant's Motion for Recusal of Judges Denied

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Beschluss vom 8. Mai 2018 \n BEK 2018 46 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident Dr. Reto Heizmann, Kantonsrichter Clara Betschart und Josef Reichlin, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin M.A. HSG Sonia Zwirner. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigter und Gesuchsteller, gegen B.________, Staatsanwalt, Staatsanwaltschaft Innerschwyz, Postfach 562, Schwyz, Gesuchsgegner, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Ausstand |\n \n\n

\n (Ausstandsgesuch vom 3. November 2017, SUI 2016 3819);- \n \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: