Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2018 44 • KG SZ BEK 2018 44 Generato dall'IA

Private Appeal Against Decision to Discontinue Criminal Proceedings

Numero d'incarto BEK 2018 44
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A private party appealed two decisions by the public prosecutor's office to discontinue criminal proceedings against two accused individuals regarding the same underlying events. The court considered the prosecutor's decision to cease investigation and found that the appeal provided no new relevant facts or legal arguments that would justify overturning the prior decisions, which had been made after a thorough examination of the evidence, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 379 Abs. 1 StPO, Art. 426 Abs. 1 StPO, Art. 62 Abs. 4 BGG, Art. 426 Abs. 4 StPO, Art. 66 Abs. 1 StPO; Private Appeal Against Decision to Discontinue Criminal Proceedings: The court considered the prosecutor's decision to cease investigation and found that the appeal provided no new relevant facts or legal arguments that would justify overturning the prior decisions, which had been made after a thorough examination of the evidence, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
tassa amministrativa abbandono del procedimento penale licenziamento amministrativo inchiesta penale nuove allegazioni di diritto omissione del ministero pubblico Einstellung Strafverfahren | Strafgesetzbuch

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 379 Abs. 1 StPO
This article is cited in the dispositive to dismiss the appeal as unfounded.
Art. 426 Abs. 1 StPO
This article is cited in the dispositive regarding the decision on the administrative fee.
Art. 62 Abs. 4 BGG
This article is cited in the dispositive concerning the procedural rejection of the appeal.
Art. 426 Abs. 4 StPO
This article is cited in the dispositive regarding the non-imposition of administrative costs.
Art. 66 Abs. 1 StPO
This article is cited in the dispositive to rule on the costs, declaring them unrecoverable from the appellant.
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2019 157
Private Party Appeal of Decision to Discontinue Criminal Proceedings
BEK 2022 127
Appeal Against Termination of Criminal Proceedings
BEK 2022 67
Appeal Against Decision to Discontinue Criminal Proceedings and Private Prosecutor Status
BEK 2023 62
Appeal Against Discontinuance of Criminal Proceedings
BEK 2025 18
Private Appeal of Prosecutor's Decision to Discontinue Criminal Proceedings

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 379 Abs. 1 StPO

This article is cited in the dispositive to dismiss the appeal as unfounded.

Art. 426 Abs. 1 StPO

This article is cited in the dispositive regarding the decision on the administrative fee.

Art. 62 Abs. 4 BGG

This article is cited in the dispositive concerning the procedural rejection of the appeal.

Art. 426 Abs. 4 StPO

This article is cited in the dispositive regarding the non-imposition of administrative costs.

Art. 66 Abs. 1 StPO

This article is cited in the dispositive to rule on the costs, declaring them unrecoverable from the appellant.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n Beschluss vom 11. Juli 2018 \n BEK 2018 43 und 44 \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident Dr. Reto Heizmann, Kantonsrichter Clara Betschart und Josef Reichlin, Gerichtsschreiber lic. iur. Mathis Bösch. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Privatkläger und Beschwerdeführer, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen 1. Staatsanwaltschaft Innerschwyz, Postfach 562, 6431 Schwyz, Strafverfolgungsbehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwalt C.________, 2. D.________, Beschuldigter und Beschwerdegegner, erbeten verteidigt durch Rechtsanwalt E.________, 3. F.________, Beschuldigter und Beschwerdegegner, |\n

\n|\n |\n |\n \n|\n betreffend |\n Einstellung |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerden gegen die Verfügungen der Staatsanwaltschaft Innerschwyz vom 20. Februar 2018, SUI 2015 7805 und SUI 2017 5083);-

\n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: