Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2018 41 • KG SZ BEK 2018 41 Generato dall'IA

Attachment Order Dispute Appeal

Numero d'incarto BEK 2018 41
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The appeal concerned a dispute over an attachment order and the objection filed against it, originating from a lower court's ruling. The appellate court reviewed the decision regarding the attachment, which had been sought by one party against the other, and ultimately upheld the lower court's disposition by confirming the validity of the attachment proceedings based on the established facts and procedural adherence.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Attachment Order Dispute Appeal: The appellate court reviewed the decision regarding the attachment, which had been sought by one party against the other, and ultimately upheld the lower court's disposition by confirming the validity of the attachment proceedings based on the established facts and procedural adherence.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
procedura di sequestro validità del sequestro censure procedurali sequestro di beni oggetto della lite legittimazione a ricorrere Arrest und Arresteinsprache | Arrest
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2019 179
Appeal Against Attachment Order Validity
BEK 2019 209
Appeal of Attachment Order Validity
BEK 2021 100
Appeal of Attachment Ruling Upheld
BEK 2018 135
Appeal of Attachment Objection Ruling
BEK 2022 116
Appeal of Provisional Attachment Order

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Beschluss vom 5. Juni 2018 \n BEK 2018 41 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin lic. iur. Daniela Pérez-Steiner, Kantonsrichter Clara Betschart und Josef Reichlin, Gerichtsschreiber lic. iur. Mathis Bösch. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Gesuchstellerin, Einsprachegegnerin und Beschwerdeführerin, vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin B.________, gegen C.________, Gesuchsgegner, Einsprecher und Beschwerdegegner, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt D.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Arrest und Arresteinsprache |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung des Einzelrichters am Bezirksgericht Schwyz vom 26. Februar 2018, ZES 2017 467);-

\n \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: