Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2018 32 • KG SZ BEK 2018 32 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Timeliness Based on Date of Mailing

Numero d'incarto BEK 2018 32
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The accused appealed a lower court's decision regarding the admissibility of their objection to a summary penalty order, contending that the appeal was filed in time. The court determined that the relevant statute required the objection to be filed within ten days of notification, and since the appellant submitted proof of mailing the objection on the tenth day, the appeal was deemed timely, as mailing on the last day of the deadline constitutes compliance with the filing requirement.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal Timeliness Based on Date of Mailing: The court determined that the relevant statute required the objection to be filed within ten days of notification, and since the appellant submitted proof of mailing the objection on the tenth day, the appeal was deemed timely, as mailing on the last day of the deadline constitutes compliance with the filing requirement.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
tempestività dell'inoltro rispetto del termine decreto penale notificazione della decisione eccezioni processuali tardive tempestività dell'invio postale Einsprache gegen Strafbefehl, Fristwahrung | Übriges Strafprozessrecht
Generato dall'IA
STK 2024 28
Appeal Timeliness and Admissibility
BEK 2021 175
Appeal on Timeliness of Objection Filed with Incorrect Postal Address
BEK 2023 139
Prosecutor v. Defendant on Timeliness of Penalty Order Objection
ZK2 2025 41
Timeliness of Appeal Following Denial of Correction Motion
BEK 2020 85
Defendant's Untimely Appeal Based on Post Office Collection Arrangement

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Beschluss vom 11. Juli 2018 \n BEK 2018 32 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Dr. Urs Tschümperlin, Kantonsrichter Clara Betschart und Josef Reichlin, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin M.A. HSG Sonia Zwirner. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigte und Beschwerdeführerin, gegen Staatsanwaltschaft March, Postfach 162, Rathausplatz 1, 8853 Lachen, Anklagebehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwältin B.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Einsprache gegen Strafbefehl, Fristwahrung |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung des Einzelrichters am Bezirksgericht March vom 1. Februar 2018, SEO 2018 5);- \n \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: