Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
BEK 2018 29 • KG SZ BEK 2018 29 Generato dall'IA

Private Complainants v. Prosecutor: Discontinuance of Defamation Proceedings

Numero d'incarto BEK 2018 29
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case concerns a challenge to a prosecutor's decision to discontinue criminal proceedings initiated by private complainants concerning allegations of defamation and slander. The private complainants appealed this discontinuance order, arguing that the evidence supported proceeding with the charges. The court ultimately upheld the prosecutor's decision to discontinue the proceedings, reasoning that the evidence did not provide a sufficient basis for establishing the elements of the alleged offenses beyond a reasonable doubt, thus warranting the termination of the investigation.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 345 Abs. 1 StPO, Art. 429 Abs. 1 lit. a StPO; Private Complainants v. Prosecutor: Discontinuance of Defamation Proceedings: The private complainants appealed this discontinuance order, arguing that the evidence supported proceeding with the charges. The court ultimately upheld the prosecutor's decision to discontinue the proceedings, reasoning that the evidence did not provide a sufficient basis for establishing the elements of the alleged offenses beyond a reasonable doubt, thus warranting the termination of the investigation.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
procedura per diffamazione stralcio del procedimento dubbio ragionevole ricusazione del pubblico ministero inchiesta penale perseguimento penale in via sostitutiva

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 345 Abs. 1 StPO

The appeal was dismissed based on this provision which governs the appellate review of decisions to discontinue criminal proceedings.

Art. 429 Abs. 1 lit. a StPO

The costs of the judicial appeal proceedings were determined according to this provision.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n Beschluss vom 3. Mai 2018 \n BEK 2018 29 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin lic. iur. Daniela Pérez-Steiner, Kantonsrichter Clara Betschart und Josef Reichlin, Gerichtsschreiber lic. iur. Mathis Bösch. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________ und B.________, Privatkläger und Beschwerdeführer, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt C.________, gegen 1. D.________, Beschuldigte und Beschwerdegegnerin, 2. Staatsanwaltschaft Innerschwyz, Postfach 562, 6431 Schwyz, Strafverfolgungsbehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwalt E.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Einstellung Strafverfahren (Verleumdung, üble Nachrede) |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung der Staatsanwaltschaft Innerschwyz vom 23. Januar 2018, SUI 2017 1550);- \n \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: