Private Complainants v. Prosecutor: Discontinuance of Defamation Proceedings
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe case concerns a challenge to a prosecutor's decision to discontinue criminal proceedings initiated by private complainants concerning allegations of defamation and slander. The private complainants appealed this discontinuance order, arguing that the evidence supported proceeding with the charges. The court ultimately upheld the prosecutor's decision to discontinue the proceedings, reasoning that the evidence did not provide a sufficient basis for establishing the elements of the alleged offenses beyond a reasonable doubt, thus warranting the termination of the investigation.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAArt. 345 Abs. 1 StPO, Art. 429 Abs. 1 lit. a StPO; Private Complainants v. Prosecutor: Discontinuance of Defamation Proceedings: The private complainants appealed this discontinuance order, arguing that the evidence supported proceeding with the charges. The court ultimately upheld the prosecutor's decision to discontinue the proceedings, reasoning that the evidence did not provide a sufficient basis for establishing the elements of the alleged offenses beyond a reasonable doubt, thus warranting the termination of the investigation.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IAQuestioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe appeal was dismissed based on this provision which governs the appellate review of decisions to discontinue criminal proceedings.
The costs of the judicial appeal proceedings were determined according to this provision.
Testo completo
\n
\n
\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n Beschluss vom 3. Mai 2018 \n BEK 2018 29 \n \n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin lic. iur. Daniela Pérez-Steiner, Kantonsrichter Clara Betschart und Josef Reichlin, Gerichtsschreiber lic. iur. Mathis Bösch. |\n
\n\n
\n \n \n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n In Sachen |\n A.________ und B.________, Privatkläger und Beschwerdeführer, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt C.________, gegen 1. D.________, Beschuldigte und Beschwerdegegnerin, 2. Staatsanwaltschaft Innerschwyz, Postfach 562, 6431 Schwyz, Strafverfolgungsbehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwalt E.________, |\n
\n\n
\n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Einstellung Strafverfahren (Verleumdung, üble Nachrede) |\n \n\n
\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung der Staatsanwaltschaft Innerschwyz vom 23. Januar 2018, SUI 2017 1550);- \n \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: