Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2018 24 • KG SZ BEK 2018 24 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Discontinuation of Criminal Proceedings

Numero d'incarto BEK 2018 24
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A private party appealed a decision by the cantonal public prosecutor's office to discontinue criminal proceedings against an accused individual, challenging the decision to terminate the investigation. The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the prosecutor's decision to discontinue the proceedings was not based on an apparent violation of the law, as the evidence gathered did not clearly establish the elements of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt necessary to proceed to trial, thus upholding the initial decision to terminate the criminal process.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Discontinuation of Criminal Proceedings: The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the prosecutor's decision to discontinue the proceedings was not based on an apparent violation of the law, as the evidence gathered did not clearly establish the elements of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt necessary to proceed to trial, thus upholding the initial decision to terminate the criminal process.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
abbandono del procedimento inchiesta penale dubbio ragionevole ricusazione del pubblico ministero ritiro della querela penale procedura penale Einstellung Strafverfahren | Kantonale Staatsanwaltschaft
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2020 120
Appeal Against Decision to Discontinue Criminal Proceedings
BEK 2022 83
Private Appeal of Discontinuation of Criminal Proceedings
BEK 2018 28
Appeal Against Discontinuation of Criminal Proceedings Dismissed
GPR 2020 15
Complainant Appeal Against Discontinuation of Criminal Proceedings Upheld
BEK 2023 62
Appeal Against Discontinuance of Criminal Proceedings

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n Beschluss vom 23. April 2018 \n BEK 2018 24 \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident Dr. Reto Heizmann, Kantonsrichter Clara Betschart und Josef Reichlin, Gerichtsschreiber lic. iur. Mathis Bösch. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Privatkläger und Beschwerdeführer, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen 1. C.________, Beschuldigte und Beschwerdegegnerin, amtlich verteidigt durch Rechtsanwalt D.________, 2. Kantonale Staatsanwaltschaft, Postfach 75, SSB, 8836 Bennau, Anklagebehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwältin E.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Einstellung Strafverfahren |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung der kantonalen Staatsanwaltschaft vom 9. Januar 2018, SUB 2015 248);- \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: