Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
BEK 2018 196 • KG SZ BEK 2018 196 Generato dall'IA

Public Prosecutor v. Accused (Appeal on Termination of Psychotherapy Measure)

Numero d'incarto BEK 2018 196
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case concerns an appeal by the public prosecutor's office against a lower court's decision to terminate a mandatory psychotherapy measure imposed on the accused. The appellate court reviewed the legal basis for imposing and continuing such a measure, which requires evidence of a mental disorder requiring treatment and a significant risk of recidivism that is manageable through the measure. The court reasoned that while the initial imposition of the therapy measure was justified due to the diagnosis and risk, the continued necessity must be continuously evaluated, and if the original grounds for imposition (mental disorder and risk) are no longer sufficiently established or if the treatment goal is achieved or no longer attainable, the measure must be discontinued.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Public Prosecutor v. Accused (Appeal on Termination of Psychotherapy Measure): The appellate court reviewed the legal basis for imposing and continuing such a measure, which requires evidence of a mental disorder requiring treatment and a significant risk of recidivism that is manageable through the measure. The court reasoned that while the initial imposition of the therapy measure was justified due to the diagnosis and risk, the continued necessity must be continuously evaluated, and if the original grounds for imposition (mental disorder and risk) are no longer sufficiently established or if the treatment goal is achieved or no longer attainable, the measure must be discontinued.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
motivi validi ricusazione del pubblico ministero misura terapeutica decisione motivata cura psichiatrica motivo di revisione Ersatzmassnahme (Psychotherapie) | Zwangsmassnahmen/übrige Zwangsmassnahmen
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Beschluss vom 24. Januar 2019 \n BEK 2018 196 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident Dr. Reto Heizmann, Kantonsrichter Clara Betschart und Josef Reichlin, Gerichtsschreiber lic. iur. Mathis Bösch. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n Staatsanwaltschaft Höfe Einsiedeln, Postfach 128, 8832 Wollerau, Anklagebehörde und Beschwerdeführerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwalt A.________, gegen B.________, Beschuldigter und Beschwerdegegner, amtlich verteidigt durch Rechtsanwalt C.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Ersatzmassnahme (Psychotherapie) |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen den Beschluss des kantonalen Strafgerichts vom 23. November 2018, SGO 2018 11);- \n \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: