Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2018 190 • KG SZ BEK 2018 190 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Regarding Notification of Realization Request in Debt Enforcement

Numero d'incarto BEK 2018 190
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involves an appeal against a decision concerning the notification of a request for realization in debt enforcement proceedings (Enforcement File No. xx), where the appellant contested the decision made by the District Court President regarding this notification. The appellate court, acting as the higher cantonal supervisory authority in debt enforcement and bankruptcy matters, reviewed the matter to determine the validity of the lower court's ruling on the proper notification of the realization request to the involved parties.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal Regarding Notification of Realization Request in Debt Enforcement: xx), where the appellant contested the decision made by the District Court President regarding this notification. The appellate court, acting as the higher cantonal supervisory authority in debt enforcement and bankruptcy matters, reviewed the matter to determine the validity of the lower court's ruling on the proper notification of the realization request to the involved parties.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
domanda d'esecuzione notificazione della decisione procedura di fallimento esecuzione della sentenza proposta di giudizio procedura esecutiva Mitteilung des Verwertungsbegehrens | SchKG-Beschwerde
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2023 13
Appeal Against Debt Enforcement Proceedings Decision
BEK 2024 48
Appeal Regarding Enforcement Proceedings Under Debt Enforcement and Bankruptcy Law
BEK 2020 202
Appeal of Debt Enforcement Order
BEK 2018 107
Appeal Against Debt Attachment Notice
BEK 2020 95
Appeal Regarding Supervisory Decision in Debt Enforcement Proceedings

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Beschluss vom 9. Januar 2019 \n BEK 2018 190 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Dr. Urs Tschümperlin; Kantonsrichter Clara Betschart und Josef Reichlin. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschwerdeführer, gegen 1. Betreibungskreis Altendorf Lachen, Postfach 43, Seeplatz 1, 8853 Lachen, Beschwerdegegner, 2. Kanton Schwyz, vertr. durch Amt für Justizvollzug, Postfach 73, \n Sicherheitsstützpunkt Biberbrugg, 8836 Bennau |\n

\n|\n |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Mitteilung des Verwertungsbegehrens (Betreibung Nr. xx) |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung des Bezirksgerichtspräsidenten March vom 29. November 2018, APD 2018 29);- \n \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer \n als obere kantonale Aufsichtsbehörde in Schuldbetreibung und Konkurs, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: