Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2018 19 • KG SZ BEK 2018 19 Generato dall'IA

Review of Prosecutor's Decision to Dismiss Misconduct Investigation

Numero d'incarto BEK 2018 19
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A private complainant challenged a prosecutor's decision to dismiss an investigation into potential official misconduct, arguing that the authority failed to adequately investigate the reported facts. The reviewing court found that the initial investigation had examined the relevant circumstances, including the private complainant's submissions, and concluded there was insufficient evidence to establish the elements of the alleged offense, thus affirming the prosecutor's decision not to proceed with charges.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Review of Prosecutor's Decision to Dismiss Misconduct Investigation: The reviewing court found that the initial investigation had examined the relevant circumstances, including the private complainant's submissions, and concluded there was insufficient evidence to establish the elements of the alleged offense, thus affirming the prosecutor's decision not to proceed with charges.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
ricusazione del pubblico ministero violazione dei doveri professionali sospensione dell'istruzione controinterrogatorio del ministero pubblico ritiro della querela penale mancanza di prova Nichtanhandnahme (Amtsmissbrauch) | Nichtanhandnahme Strafverfahren
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2021 121
Complainant v. Prosecutor (Abuse of Office Investigation Dismissal)
BEK 2017 145
Prosecutor's Decision to Dismiss Abuse of Office Complaint Upheld
BEK 2024 16
Review of Prosecutor's Decision Not to Prosecute
BEK 2021 182
Appeal of Prosecutor's Decision to Dismiss Criminal Proceedings
BEK 2021 122
Private Appeal Against Dismissal of Official Misconduct Proceedings

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Beschluss vom 3. Mai 2018 \n BEK 2018 19 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Dr. Urs Tschümperlin, Kantonsrichter Clara Betschart und Josef Reichlin, Gerichtsschreiber lic. iur. Mathis Bösch. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Privatkläger und Beschwerdeführer, gegen Kantonale Staatsanwaltschaft, Postfach 75, SSB, 8836 Bennau, Strafverfolgungsbehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwalt B.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Nichtanhandnahme (Amtsmissbrauch) |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung der kantonalen Staatsanwaltschaft vom 3. Januar 2018, SUB 2017 614);- \n \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: