Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
BEK 2018 184 • KG SZ BEK 2018 184 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Prosecutor's Refusal to Prosecute Official Misconduct

Numero d'incarto BEK 2018 184
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A private complainant appealed a prosecutor's decision not to initiate proceedings concerning alleged official misconduct. The court considered the appeal against the prosecutor's refusal to prosecute the accused, upholding the initial decision because the facts presented by the complainant did not establish a sufficiently credible indication of an offense, specifically failing to meet the threshold required to compel the authorities to initiate a formal investigation into the alleged official misconduct.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Prosecutor's Refusal to Prosecute Official Misconduct: The court considered the appeal against the prosecutor's refusal to prosecute the accused, upholding the initial decision because the facts presented by the complainant did not establish a sufficiently credible indication of an offense, specifically failing to meet the threshold required to compel the authorities to initiate a formal investigation into the alleged official misconduct.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
omissione del ministero pubblico mancanza di prova reati contro i doveri d'ufficio e professionali divieto di rappresentanza dell'avvocato motivo vertente sullo sviamento di potere margine d'apprezzamento del ministero pubblico Nichtanhandnahme (Amtsmissbrauch) | Nichtanhandnahme Strafverfahren
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Verfügung vom 14. Dezember 2018 \n BEK 2018 184 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin lic. iur. Daniela Pérez-Steiner, Gerichtsschreiber lic. iur. Mathis Bösch. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Privatkläger und Beschwerdeführer, gegen 1. B.________, Beschuldigter und Beschwerdegegner, 2. Kantonale Staatsanwaltschaft, Postfach 75, SSB, 8836 Bennau, Strafverfolgungsbehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwalt C.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Nichtanhandnahme (Amtsmissbrauch) |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung der kantonalen Staatsanwaltschaft vom 25. Oktober 2018, SUB 2018 563);- \n \n \n \n hat die Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: