Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
BEK 2018 183 • KG SZ BEK 2018 183 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Refusal to Prosecute for Official Misconduct

Numero d'incarto BEK 2018 183
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A complainant appealed a prosecutor's decision not to initiate proceedings regarding an allegation of official misconduct against an accused individual, where the initial complaint alleged that an official had misused their authority. The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the prosecutor's decision not to prosecute was supported by a review of the established facts and legal provisions, indicating that the alleged conduct did not meet the threshold for the charged offense, thus upholding the decision to refrain from taking up the case.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Refusal to Prosecute for Official Misconduct: The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the prosecutor's decision not to prosecute was supported by a review of the established facts and legal provisions, indicating that the alleged conduct did not meet the threshold for the charged offense, thus upholding the decision to refrain from taking up the case.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
direzione del processo ricusazione del pubblico ministero decisione di non sollevare obiezioni reati contro i doveri d'ufficio e professionali ritiro della querela penale divieto di rappresentanza dell'avvocato Nichtanhandnahme (Amtsmissbrauch) | Nichtanhandnahme Strafverfahren
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Verfügung vom 14. Dezember 2018 \n BEK 2018 183 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin lic. iur. Daniela Pérez-Steiner, Gerichtsschreiber lic. iur. Mathis Bösch. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Strafanzeigeerstatter und Beschwerdeführer, gegen 1. B.________, Beschuldigter und Beschwerdegegner, 2. Kantonale Staatsanwaltschaft, Postfach 75, SSB, 8836 Bennau, Strafverfolgungsbehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwalt C.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Nichtanhandnahme (Amtsmissbrauch) |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung der kantonalen Staatsanwaltschaft vom 25. Oktober 2018, SUB 2018 562);- \n \n \n \n hat die Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: