Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
BEK 2018 182 • KG SZ BEK 2018 182 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Regarding Compensation After Termination of Criminal Proceedings

Numero d'incarto BEK 2018 182
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

An accused party appealed a public prosecutor's decision concerning compensation and satisfaction following the termination of criminal proceedings. The court was tasked with reviewing the legality of the decision to discontinue the criminal investigation under specific case file numbers and whether the appellant was entitled to the requested compensation and satisfaction related to the procedural handling. The court reasoned that since the decision under appeal was merely a procedural disposition (a decision on the termination of proceedings regarding compensation and satisfaction) and not a final judgment on the merits of the underlying criminal case, it lacked the necessary finality to be subject to a substantive appeal concerning the underlying facts or the legality of the termination itself, thus affirming the prosecutor's disposition regarding indemnity.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal Regarding Compensation After Termination of Criminal Proceedings: The court was tasked with reviewing the legality of the decision to discontinue the criminal investigation under specific case file numbers and whether the appellant was entitled to the requested compensation and satisfaction related to the procedural handling. The court reasoned that since the decision under appeal was merely a procedural disposition (a decision on the termination of proceedings regarding compensation and satisfaction) and not a final judgment on the merits of the underlying criminal case, it lacked the necessary finality to be subject to a substantive appeal concerning the underlying facts or the legality of the termination itself, thus affirming the prosecutor's disposition regarding indemnity.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
stralcio del procedimento atti penali controllo della procedura motivazione nel merito amministrazione della giustizia impugnabilità della decisione di rinvio
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Beschluss vom 9. Mai 2019 \n BEK 2018 182 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Dr. Urs Tschümperlin, Kantonsrichter Clara Betschart und Josef Reichlin, Gerichtsschreiber lic. iur. Mathis Bösch. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigter und Beschwerdeführer, gegen Staatsanwaltschaft Höfe Einsiedeln, Postfach 128, 8832 Wollerau, Strafverfolgungsbehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwältin B.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Einstellungsverfügung (Entschädigung und Genugtuung) |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung der Staatsanwaltschaft Höfe Einsiedeln vom 26. Oktober 2018, SUH 2017 2194);- \n \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: