Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2018 171 • KG SZ BEK 2018 171 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Finality of Criminal Penalty Order

Numero d'incarto BEK 2018 171
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A defendant filed a complaint against a decision by the Public Prosecutor's Office that declared a criminal penalty order legally final. The court reviewed the appeal against the prosecutor's decision, which concerned the finality of the penalty order, and ultimately had to rule on the admissibility and merits of the defendant's challenge to the finality determination.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Finality of Criminal Penalty Order: The court reviewed the appeal against the prosecutor's decision, which concerned the finality of the penalty order, and ultimately had to rule on the admissibility and merits of the defendant's challenge to the finality determination.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
sanzione penale controllo della commisurazione della pena decreto penale di accusa inoltro di querela penale omissione del ministero pubblico autorizzazione all’esecuzione Feststellung der Rechtskraft (Strafbefehl) | Übriges Strafprozessrecht
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2025 102
Appeal Against Procedural Order Denying Finality of Penalty Order
BEK 2025 24
Defendant's Appeal Against Prosecutor's Determination of Penalty Order Finality Barred by Untimely Appeal of Penalty Order
BEK 2022 101
Appeal Regarding Finality of Untimely Penalty Order
BEK 2023 139
Prosecutor v. Defendant on Timeliness of Penalty Order Objection
BEK 2021 48
Prosecutor's Decision Finality Appeal Dismissed

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Verfügung vom 20. November 2018 \n BEK 2018 171 \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident Dr. Reto Heizmann. |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigter und Beschwerdeführer, gegen Staatsanwaltschaft March, Postfach 162, Rathausplatz 1, 8853 Lachen, Strafverfolgungsbehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwalt B.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Feststellung der Rechtskraft (Strafbefehl) |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung der Staatsanwaltschaft March vom 28. September 2018, SUM 2018 1128);- \n \n \n \n hat der Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident, \n