Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2018 170 • KG SZ BEK 2018 170 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Discontinuation of Criminal Proceedings Regarding Compensation and Satisfaction

Numero d'incarto BEK 2018 170
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Spese processuali a carico del ricorrente / reclamante
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A defendant, appealing a prosecutor's decision regarding the discontinuation of criminal proceedings concerning compensation and satisfaction, challenged the ruling. The court, when considering the appeal against the prosecutor's order to discontinue the criminal investigation, ultimately upheld the prosecutor's decision to terminate the proceedings, thereby rejecting the defendant's appeal concerning the claims for compensation and satisfaction stemming from the investigation.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 429 Abs. 1 lit. a StPO, Art. 432 Abs. 1 StPO, Art. 429 Abs. 5 StPO, Art. 66 Abs. 1 LTF, Art. 68 Abs. 2 LTF; Appeal Against Discontinuation of Criminal Proceedings Regarding Compensation and Satisfaction: The court, when considering the appeal against the prosecutor's order to discontinue the criminal investigation, ultimately upheld the prosecutor's decision to terminate the proceedings, thereby rejecting the defendant's appeal concerning the claims for compensation and satisfaction stemming from the investigation.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
abbandono del procedimento soddisfacimento del credito inchiesta penale ricusazione del pubblico ministero ritiro della querela penale motivi

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 429 Abs. 1 lit. a StPO
The appeal is rejected based on this provision, concerning the decision on compensation for custody.
Art. 432 Abs. 1 StPO
The decision on compensation for expenses of the private prosecutors is based on this provision.
Art. 429 Abs. 5 StPO
The decision regarding the compensation for the appellant's necessary expenses is based on this provision.
Art. 66 Abs. 1 LTF
The appellant is ordered to pay the court costs.
Art. 68 Abs. 2 LTF
The private prosecutors are awarded compensation for their expenses.
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2019 124
Appeal Against Discontinuance of Criminal Proceedings Regarding Compensation
GPR 2021 4
Appeal Against Discontinuation of Criminal Proceedings and Claim for Satisfaction
GPR 2018 15
Appeal of Compensation Denial Following Discontinuation of Criminal Proceedings
GPR 2017 14
Appeal Regarding Compensation After Discontinuation of Criminal Proceedings
BEK 2023 62
Appeal Against Discontinuance of Criminal Proceedings

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 429 Abs. 1 lit. a StPO

The appeal is rejected based on this provision, concerning the decision on compensation for custody.

Art. 432 Abs. 1 StPO

The decision on compensation for expenses of the private prosecutors is based on this provision.

Art. 429 Abs. 5 StPO

The decision regarding the compensation for the appellant's necessary expenses is based on this provision.

Art. 66 Abs. 1 LTF

The appellant is ordered to pay the court costs.

Art. 68 Abs. 2 LTF

The private prosecutors are awarded compensation for their expenses.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Beschluss vom 21. März 2019 \n BEK 2018 170 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident Dr. Reto Heizmann, Kantonsrichter Clara Betschart und Josef Reichlin, Gerichtsschreiber lic. iur. Mathis Bösch. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigter und Beschwerdeführer, gegen 1. Staatsanwaltschaft Höfe Einsiedeln, Postfach 128, 8832 Wollerau, Strafverfolgungsbehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwältin B.________, 2. C.________ und D.________, Privatkläger und Beschwerdegegner, beide vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt E.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Einstellung Strafverfahren (Entschädigung/Genugtuung) |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung der Staatsanwaltschaft Höfe Einsiedeln vom 5. Oktober 2018, SUH 2011 1041, SUH 2013 488);-

\n \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: