Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2018 17 • KG SZ BEK 2018 17 Generato dall'IA

Private Complainants v. Public Prosecutor (Dismissal of Abuse of Office Charges)

Numero d'incarto BEK 2018 17
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Private complainants appealed a cantonal public prosecutor's decision not to prosecute several accused individuals for alleged offenses including abuse of office, breach of trust, forgery, and obtaining a false certification, following a preliminary investigation; the court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the prosecutor's determination not to proceed with the charges was legally sound because the evidence presented did not sufficiently support the criminal allegations made by the private parties against the accused officials and others.

Regesto Legislator

Ufficiale

Nichtanhandnahme (Amtsmissbrauch, ungetreue Amtsführung, Urkundenfälschung, Erschleichung einer falschen Beurkundung) | Nichtanhandnahme Strafverfahren

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
accuse di abuso ricusazione di pubblici ministeri pubblici ufficiali altri reati abuso di potere perseguimento penale per diffamazione

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 393 Abs. 2 StPO
Used to uphold the decision of inadmissibility of the appeal regarding the non-commencement of proceedings.
Art. 66 Abs. 1 StPO
Used to order the appellants to bear the judicial costs.
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2018 16
Plaintiffs v. Public Prosecutor's Office (Abuse of Office and Discrimination Allegations)
BEK 2018 11
Appeal Against Non-Prosecution Decision for Abuse of Office and Other Offenses
BEK 2019 10
Private Complainant v. Public Prosecutor (Abuse of Office Proceedings)
BEK 2021 12
Private Complainants v. Prosecutor (Coercion and Defamation Charges)
BEK 2019 72
Complainant v. Cantonal Prosecutor's Office (Criminal Proceedings Dismissal Appeal)

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 393 Abs. 2 StPO

Used to uphold the decision of inadmissibility of the appeal regarding the non-commencement of proceedings.

Art. 66 Abs. 1 StPO

Used to order the appellants to bear the judicial costs.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Verfügung vom 16. Februar 2018 \n BEK 2018 17 \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Dr. Urs Tschümperlin. |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n 1. A.________, Privatkläger und Beschwerdeführer, 2. B.________, Beschwerdeführerin, 3. C.________, neu firmierend: D.________, Privatklägerin und Beschwerdeführerin, gegen 1. Kantonale Staatsanwaltschaft, Postfach 75, Sicherheitsstützpunkt Biberbrugg, 8836 Bennau, Strafverfolgungsbehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwältin E.________, 2. F.________, Beschuldigte und Beschwerdegegnerin, 3. G.________, Beschuldigter und Beschwerdegegner, 4. H.________, Beschuldigter und Beschwerdegegner, 5. I._________, Beschuldigter und Beschwerdegegner, 6. J.________, Beschuldigter und Beschwerdegegner, |\n

\n\n

\n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n betreffend |\n Nichtanhandnahme (Amtsmissbrauch, ungetreue Amtsführung, Urkundenfälschung, Erschleichung einer falschen Beurkundung) |\n

\n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Nichtanhandnahmeverfügung der kantonalen Staatsanwaltschaft vom 3. Januar 2018, SUB 2017 21, 22, 23, 24 und 342);-

\n \n \n \n hat der Kantonsgerichtspräsident, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: