Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2018 168 • KG SZ BEK 2018 168 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Denial of Official Defense Counsel

Numero d'incarto BEK 2018 168
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involves a defendant's appeal against a decision by the cantonal public prosecutor's office concerning the appointment of necessary/official defense counsel. The court addressed whether the conditions for appointing official defense were met in the underlying proceedings, concluding that the requirements for such an appointment were absent, thereby upholding the prosecutor's decision to deny official defense based on the relevant procedural criteria.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Denial of Official Defense Counsel: The court addressed whether the conditions for appointing official defense were met in the underlying proceedings, concluding that the requirements for such an appointment were absent, thereby upholding the prosecutor's decision to deny official defense based on the relevant procedural criteria.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
difesa d'ufficio nomina di un impiegato statale presupposto processuale diritti della difesa omissione del ministero pubblico omissione del difensore notwendige/amtliche Verteidigung | UP/amtliche Verteidigung
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2018 52
Appeal Regarding Denial of Official Defense Counsel
BEK 2017 58
Appellant v. Cantonal Prosecutor's Office (Mandatory Defense Counsel Appointment)
BEK 2022 114
Defendant v. Prosecutor on Appointment of Defense Counsel
BEK 2017 80
Prosecutorial Appointment of Defense Counsel Premature
BEK 2024 175
Denial of Appointed Counsel Upheld

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Beschluss vom 10. April 2019 \n BEK 2018 168 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident Dr. Reto Heizmann, Kantonsrichter Clara Betschart und Josef Reichlin, Gerichtsschreiberin lic. iur. Gabriela Thurnherr. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigter und Beschwerdeführer, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen Kantonale Staatsanwaltschaft, Postfach 75, Sicherheitsstützpunkt \n Biberbrugg, 8836 Bennau, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n notwendige/amtliche Verteidigung |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung der kantonalen Staatanwaltschaft vom 10. Oktober 2018, SUB 2018 314);- \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: