Application for Judge Recusal Denied
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe appellant sought the recusal of a single judge from a case, alleging grounds for disqualification and claiming a denial of justice by the judge. The court considered the appellant's application for recusal and the objection from the opposing party, ultimately determining that the specific facts presented did not establish a legitimate apprehension of bias or a breach of the duty to decide, thus rejecting the appeal concerning the judge's impartiality and the asserted denial of justice.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAApplication for Judge Recusal Denied: The court considered the appellant's application for recusal and the objection from the opposing party, ultimately determining that the specific facts presented did not establish a legitimate apprehension of bias or a breach of the duty to decide, thus rejecting the appeal concerning the judge's impartiality and the asserted denial of justice.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IATesto completo
\n
\n
\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n \n Beschluss vom 23. November 2018 \n BEK 2018 162 \n \n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Dr. Urs Tschümperlin, Kantonsrichter Clara Betschart und Josef Reichlin. |\n
\n\n
\n \n \n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigter, gegen Einzelrichter B.________, c/o Bezirksgericht Einsiedeln, Postfach 38, Eisenbahnstrasse 20a, 8840 Einsiedeln, Gesuchsgegner, |\n
\n\n
\n \n
\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Ausstand sowie Rechtsverweigerung |\n \n\n
\n (Ausstandsgesuch vom 17. Oktober 2018, SEO 2017 003);- \n \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: