Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2018 16 • KG SZ BEK 2018 16 Generato dall'IA

Plaintiffs v. Public Prosecutor's Office (Abuse of Office and Discrimination Allegations)

Numero d'incarto BEK 2018 16
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Private plaintiffs appealed a decision by the cantonal public prosecutor's office to dismiss criminal proceedings concerning allegations of abuse of office, disloyal management, and racial discrimination. The appellate court upheld the prosecutor's decision of non-commencement of proceedings, finding that the plaintiffs had failed to present sufficient evidence or indications that the investigated public official had committed the alleged offenses of abuse of office or disloyal management, as the required elements for these offenses were not met based on the presented facts.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Plaintiffs v. Public Prosecutor's Office (Abuse of Office and Discrimination Allegations): The appellate court upheld the prosecutor's decision of non-commencement of proceedings, finding that the plaintiffs had failed to present sufficient evidence or indications that the investigated public official had committed the alleged offenses of abuse of office or disloyal management, as the required elements for these offenses were not met based on the presented facts.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
accuse di abuso pubblici ufficiali ricusazione del pubblico ministero procedura per diffamazione violazione dei doveri professionali mancanza di prova
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2018 17
Private Complainants v. Public Prosecutor (Dismissal of Abuse of Office Charges)
BEK 2018 11
Appeal Against Non-Prosecution Decision for Abuse of Office and Other Offenses
BEK 2018 12
Private Plaintiffs v. Prosecutor's Decision Not to Prosecute Abuse of Office Allegations
BEK 2018 6
Appeal Against Dismissal of Criminal Proceedings for Abuse of Office and Other Charges
BEK 2021 121
Complainant v. Prosecutor (Abuse of Office Investigation Dismissal)

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Verfügung vom 20. Februar 2018 \n BEK 2018 16 \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Dr. Urs Tschümperlin. |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n 1. A.________, Privatkläger und Beschwerdeführer, 2. B.________, Privatklägerin und Beschwerdeführerin, 3. C.________, neu firmierend: D.________, Privatklägerin und Beschwerdeführerin, gegen 1. Kantonale Staatsanwaltschaft, Postfach 75, Sicherheitsstützpunkt Biberbrugg, 8836 Bennau, Strafverfolgungsbehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwältin E.________, 2. F.________, Beschuldigter und Beschwerdegegner, |\n

\n\n

\n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Nichtanhandnahme (Amtsmissbrauch, ungetreue Amtsführung, Rassendiskriminierung) |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Nichtanhandnahmeverfügung der kantonalen Staatsanwaltschaft vom 3. Januar 2018, SUB 2017 610);-

\n \n hat der Kantonsgerichtspräsident, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: