Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2018 151 • KG SZ BEK 2018 151 Generato dall'IA

Prosecutor's Order for DNA Profile Upheld Against Appellant

Numero d'incarto BEK 2018 151
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Spese processuali a carico del ricorrente / reclamante
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The appellant challenged a prosecutor's order mandating the creation of a DNA profile, where the initial proceedings involved an investigation into an unknown perpetrator. The court upheld the prosecutor's decision, reasoning that the coercive measure was justified because there was a sufficient initial suspicion based on specific facts indicating the appellant's involvement in the offense, thereby meeting the necessary legal threshold for ordering DNA sampling to aid in the criminal investigation.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Prosecutor's Order for DNA Profile Upheld Against Appellant: The court upheld the prosecutor's decision, reasoning that the coercive measure was justified because there was a sufficient initial suspicion based on specific facts indicating the appellant's involvement in the offense, thereby meeting the necessary legal threshold for ordering DNA sampling to aid in the criminal investigation.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
profilo del DNA inchiesta penale decreto penale di accusa decisione motivata prova dell'identità perizia per accertamento dell'età
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2022 153
Prosecutor's DNA Profile Order Upheld Over Proportionality Challenge
BEK 2025 31
Prosecutor's Order for DNA Profile Collection Upheld Against Rights Infringement Claim
BEK 2020 139
Prosecutor's DNA Order Upheld in Criminal Investigation Appeal
BEK 2024 2
Appeal Against DNA Profile Order Dismissed
BEK 2023 9
Prosecutor's Order for DNA Profile Upheld in Robbery Case

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Beschluss vom 13. Februar 2019 \n BEK 2018 151 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin lic. iur. Daniela Pérez-Steiner, Kantonsrichter Clara Betschart und Josef Reichlin, Gerichtsschreiberin lic. iur. Gabriela Thurnherr. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigter und Beschwerdeführer, gegen Staatsanwaltschaft Höfe Einsiedeln, Postfach 128, Bahnhofstrasse 4, 8832 Wollerau, Strafverfolgungsbehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwältin B.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Anordnung und Auftrag zur DNA-Profilerstellung |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung der Staatsanwaltschaft Höfe Einsiedeln vom 20. September 2018, SUH 2018 1458);-

\n \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: