Company v. Enforcement Decision Appeal Dismissal
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAA company filed a complaint against a decision by a district court president regarding debt collection proceedings, specifically challenging the rejection of its appeal concerning the enforcement proceedings. The appellate court, in its decision, ultimately dismissed the appeal because the challenging party failed to specify the exact challenged decisions in its appeal documents, thus not meeting the formal requirements for judicial review of the lower court's ruling in the enforcement matter.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IACompany v. Enforcement Decision Appeal Dismissal: The appellate court, in its decision, ultimately dismissed the appeal because the challenging party failed to specify the exact challenged decisions in its appeal documents, thus not meeting the formal requirements for judicial review of the lower court's ruling in the enforcement matter.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IATesto completo
\n
\n
\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n \n Verfügung vom 22. Oktober 2018 \n BEK 2018 148 \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident Dr. Reto Heizmann. |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n In Sachen |\n A.________ AG, Beschwerdeführerin, gegen Betreibungskreis Altendorf Lachen, Postfach 43, Seeplatz 1, 8853 Lachen, Beschwerdegegner, |\n
\n\n
\n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n SchKG-Beschwerde |\n \n\n
\n (Beschwerde gegen den Entscheid des Gerichtspräsidenten am Bezirksgericht March vom 17. August 2018, APD 2018 18, 19 und 21);-
\n \n \n \n hat der Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: