Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
BEK 2018 148 • KG SZ BEK 2018 148 Generato dall'IA

Company v. Enforcement Decision Appeal Dismissal

Numero d'incarto BEK 2018 148
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A company filed a complaint against a decision by a district court president regarding debt collection proceedings, specifically challenging the rejection of its appeal concerning the enforcement proceedings. The appellate court, in its decision, ultimately dismissed the appeal because the challenging party failed to specify the exact challenged decisions in its appeal documents, thus not meeting the formal requirements for judicial review of the lower court's ruling in the enforcement matter.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Company v. Enforcement Decision Appeal Dismissal: The appellate court, in its decision, ultimately dismissed the appeal because the challenging party failed to specify the exact challenged decisions in its appeal documents, thus not meeting the formal requirements for judicial review of the lower court's ruling in the enforcement matter.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
decisione d'esecuzione incasso sindacato giurisdizionale licenziamento amministrativo oggetto della lite impugnazione della cancellazione SchKG-Beschwerde | March unt. SchKG Aufsicht
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Verfügung vom 22. Oktober 2018 \n BEK 2018 148 \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident Dr. Reto Heizmann. |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________ AG, Beschwerdeführerin, gegen Betreibungskreis Altendorf Lachen, Postfach 43, Seeplatz 1, 8853 Lachen, Beschwerdegegner, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n SchKG-Beschwerde |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen den Entscheid des Gerichtspräsidenten am Bezirksgericht March vom 17. August 2018, APD 2018 18, 19 und 21);-

\n \n \n \n hat der Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: