Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
BEK 2018 146 • KG SZ BEK 2018 146 Generato dall'IA

Private Prosecution Appeal Against Decision to Discontinue Criminal Proceedings

Numero d'incarto BEK 2018 146
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The appellant, acting as the private prosecutor, appealed a public prosecutor's decision to discontinue criminal proceedings against the respondent based on insufficient evidence. The court was asked to review this decision regarding the discontinuation of the criminal matter. The court ultimately upheld the prosecutor's decision, reasoning that the evidence presented did not meet the threshold required to reasonably assume the accused committed the alleged acts, thereby justifying the initial decision to terminate the proceedings due to a lack of sufficient grounds for indictment.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Private Prosecution Appeal Against Decision to Discontinue Criminal Proceedings: The court was asked to review this decision regarding the discontinuation of the criminal matter. The court ultimately upheld the prosecutor's decision, reasoning that the evidence presented did not meet the threshold required to reasonably assume the accused committed the alleged acts, thereby justifying the initial decision to terminate the proceedings due to a lack of sufficient grounds for indictment.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
abbandono del procedimento penale decreto di rinvio a giudizio omissione del ministero pubblico difesa penale sindacato giurisdizionale domanda di ricusazione Einstellung Strafverfahren | Staatstanwaltschaft des Bezirks March
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Beschluss vom 26. März 2019 \n BEK 2018 146 \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident Dr. Reto Heizmann, Kantonsrichter Clara Betschart und Josef Reichlin, Gerichtsschreiber lic. iur. Mathis Bösch. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Privatkläger und Beschwerdeführer, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen 1. C.________, Beschuldigter und Beschwerdegegner, 2. Staatsanwaltschaft March, Postfach 162, 8853 Lachen, Strafverfolgungsbehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwalt D.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Einstellung Strafverfahren |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung der Staatsanwaltschaft March vom 30. August 2018, SUM 2015 1535);- \n \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: