Private Prosecution Appeal Against Decision to Discontinue Criminal Proceedings
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe appellant, acting as the private prosecutor, appealed a public prosecutor's decision to discontinue criminal proceedings against the respondent based on insufficient evidence. The court was asked to review this decision regarding the discontinuation of the criminal matter. The court ultimately upheld the prosecutor's decision, reasoning that the evidence presented did not meet the threshold required to reasonably assume the accused committed the alleged acts, thereby justifying the initial decision to terminate the proceedings due to a lack of sufficient grounds for indictment.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAPrivate Prosecution Appeal Against Decision to Discontinue Criminal Proceedings: The court was asked to review this decision regarding the discontinuation of the criminal matter. The court ultimately upheld the prosecutor's decision, reasoning that the evidence presented did not meet the threshold required to reasonably assume the accused committed the alleged acts, thereby justifying the initial decision to terminate the proceedings due to a lack of sufficient grounds for indictment.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IATesto completo
\n
\n
\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n \n Beschluss vom 26. März 2019 \n BEK 2018 146 \n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident Dr. Reto Heizmann, Kantonsrichter Clara Betschart und Josef Reichlin, Gerichtsschreiber lic. iur. Mathis Bösch. |\n
\n\n
\n \n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Privatkläger und Beschwerdeführer, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen 1. C.________, Beschuldigter und Beschwerdegegner, 2. Staatsanwaltschaft March, Postfach 162, 8853 Lachen, Strafverfolgungsbehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwalt D.________, |\n
\n\n
\n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Einstellung Strafverfahren |\n \n\n
\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung der Staatsanwaltschaft March vom 30. August 2018, SUM 2015 1535);- \n \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: