Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
BEK 2018 145 • KG SZ BEK 2018 145 Generato dall'IA

Provisional Execution Appeal Upheld on Evidentiary Basis

Numero d'incarto BEK 2018 145
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A litigant appealed a lower court's decision regarding provisional letters of execution (provisorische Rechtsöffnung) after the lower court had granted the request for such execution, stemming from a dispute over an obligation evidenced by a document. The appellate court reviewed the appeal, which challenged the lower court's finding that the prerequisite legal basis for granting provisional execution—specifically, the apparent existence of a debt or claim—had been sufficiently established, ultimately upholding the lower court's ruling by affirming that the submitted evidence supported the issuance of the provisional execution order.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Provisional Execution Appeal Upheld on Evidentiary Basis: The appellate court reviewed the appeal, which challenged the lower court's finding that the prerequisite legal basis for granting provisional execution—specifically, the apparent existence of a debt or claim—had been sufficiently established, ultimately upholding the lower court's ruling by affirming that the submitted evidence supported the issuance of the provisional execution order.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
base probatoria azione di rivendicazione nel pignoramento domanda di continuazione dell'esecuzione impugnabilità della decisione di rinvio procedimento pregiudiziale d'urgenza bene impignorabile provisorische Rechtsöffnung | Rechtsöffnung provisorische
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Beschluss vom 31. Januar 2019 \n BEK 2018 145 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Dr. Urs Tschümperlin, Kantonsrichter Clara Betschart und Josef Reichlin, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin MLaw Rebecca Winnewisser. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Gesuchsgegner und Beschwerdeführer, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen C.________, Gesuchsteller und Beschwerdegegner, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt D.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n provisorische Rechtsöffnung |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung des Einzelrichters am Bezirksgericht Höfe vom 24. August 2018, ZES 2018 407);- \n \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: