Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2018 12 • KG SZ BEK 2018 12 Generato dall'IA

Private Plaintiffs v. Prosecutor's Decision Not to Prosecute Abuse of Office Allegations

Numero d'incarto BEK 2018 12
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The private plaintiffs appealed a prosecutor's decision not to open criminal proceedings concerning allegations of abuse of office, breach of trust, forgery, and racial discrimination against the accused. The court, reviewing the non-committal order, reasoned that the prosecutor's discretionary decision was not manifestly arbitrary or contrary to the law, thus upholding the decision to dismiss the investigation because the alleged facts did not meet the threshold for initiating criminal prosecution.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Private Plaintiffs v. Prosecutor's Decision Not to Prosecute Abuse of Office Allegations: The court, reviewing the non-committal order, reasoned that the prosecutor's discretionary decision was not manifestly arbitrary or contrary to the law, thus upholding the decision to dismiss the investigation because the alleged facts did not meet the threshold for initiating criminal prosecution.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
azione penale privata accuse di abuso inchiesta penale procedimento per falsità difetto di legittimazione del ministero pubblico apertura della procedura
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2018 8
Appeal of Prosecutor's Decision Not to Initiate Criminal Proceedings
BEK 2021 121
Complainant v. Prosecutor (Abuse of Office Investigation Dismissal)
BEK 2017 145
Prosecutor's Decision to Dismiss Abuse of Office Complaint Upheld
BEK 2019 47
Appeal of Prosecutor's Refusal to Initiate Criminal Proceedings for Misconduct and Discrimination
BEK 2018 16
Plaintiffs v. Public Prosecutor's Office (Abuse of Office and Discrimination Allegations)

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Verfügung vom 20. Februar 2018 \n BEK 2018 12 \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Dr. Urs Tschümperlin. |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n 1. A.________, Privatkläger und Beschwerdeführer, 2. B.________, Privatklägerin und Beschwerdeführerin, 3. C.________, neu firmierend: D.________, Privatklägerin und Beschwerdeführerin, gegen 1. Kantonale Staatsanwaltschaft, Postfach 75, Sicherheitsstützpunkt Biberbrugg, 8836 Bennau, Strafverfolgungsbehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwältin E.________, 2. F.________, Beschuldigter und Beschwerdegegner, |\n

\n|\n betreffend |\n Nichtanhandnahme (Amtsmissbrauch, ungetreue Amtsführung, Urkundenfälschung, Rassendiskriminierung) |\n

\n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Nichtanhandnahmeverfügung der kantonalen Staatsanwaltschaft vom 3. Januar 2018, SUB 2017 378);-

\n \n \n \n hat der Kantonsgerichtspräsident, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: