Traffic Violation Conviction Appeal Upheld
Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe appeal concerned a conviction for a traffic violation, where the appellant challenged the lower court's finding regarding the facts and the resulting penalty. The appellate court reviewed the evidence, specifically focusing on whether the factual determination underlying the initial conviction was sufficiently supported, ultimately upholding the original verdict because the assessment of the evidence presented by the first instance court was not demonstrably flawed or contrary to the established facts.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IATraffic Violation Conviction Appeal Upheld: The appellate court reviewed the evidence, specifically focusing on whether the factual determination underlying the initial conviction was sufficiently supported, ultimately upholding the original verdict because the assessment of the evidence presented by the first instance court was not demonstrably flawed or contrary to the established facts.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IATesto completo
\n
\n
\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n \n Urteil vom 23. Mai 2019 \n BEK 2018 116 \n \n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Dr. Urs Tschümperlin, Kantonsrichter Clara Betschart und Josef Reichlin, a.o. Gerichtsschreiber MLaw Nicola Bucher |\n
\n\n
\n \n \n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigter und Berufungsführer, gegen Staatsanwaltschaft March, Postfach 162, Rathausplatz 1, 8853 Lachen, Anklagebehörde und Berufungsgegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwalt B.________, |\n
\n\n
\n \n \n
\n\n| | | \n betreffend · \n Verletzung der Verkehrsregeln (