Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2018 108 • KG SZ BEK 2018 108 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Regarding Service Costs in Debt Enforcement Proceedings

Numero d'incarto BEK 2018 108
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

An appellant challenged a decision regarding service costs for a payment order in debt enforcement proceedings. The court considered whether the lower court correctly upheld the assessment of these costs against the appellant in the context of the enforcement action. The court ultimately ruled on the appeal concerning the service costs associated with the payment order in the specified debt enforcement matter, upholding the prior decision regarding the assessment of those fees.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal Regarding Service Costs in Debt Enforcement Proceedings: The court considered whether the lower court correctly upheld the assessment of these costs against the appellant in the context of the enforcement action. The court ultimately ruled on the appeal concerning the service costs associated with the payment order in the specified debt enforcement matter, upholding the prior decision regarding the assessment of those fees.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
spese d'esecuzione tassazione delle spese ordine di pagamento procedura esecutiva riscossione di tasse arretrati alimentari Zustellungskosten Zahlungsbefehl | SchKG-Beschwerde
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2018 189
Appeal Regarding Service Fees in Debt Enforcement Proceedings
BEK 2017 151
Appeal Against Collection Costs in Debt Enforcement Proceeding
BEK 2023 13
Appeal Against Debt Enforcement Proceedings Decision
BEK 2017 21
Appeal Regarding Validity of Service of Payment Order in Debt Enforcement
BEK 2018 62
Enforcement Office Service Fee Dispute

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Verfügung vom 18. Januar 2019 \n BEK 2018 108 \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Dr. Urs Tschümperlin. |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschwerdeführer, gegen Betreibungskreis Altendorf Lachen, Postfach 43, Seeplatz 1, 8853 Lachen, Beschwerdegegner, |\n

\n|\n betreffend |\n Zustellungskosten Zahlungsbefehl (Betreibung Nr. xx) |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen den Entscheid des Bezirksgerichtspräsidenten March vom 28. Juni 2018, APD 2018 16);- \n \n \n \n hat der Kantonsgerichtspräsident \n als Präsident der oberen kantonalen Aufsichtsbehörde in Schuldbetreibung und Konkurs (Beschwerdekammer), \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: