Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2018 103 • KG SZ BEK 2018 103 Generato dall'IA

Appeal of Criminal Penalty Order Based on Incomplete Notification

Numero d'incarto BEK 2018 103
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

An accused person appealed a decision of the Public Prosecutor's Office declaring a criminal penalty order legally binding, arguing that the appeal period had not yet expired because the notification of the decision was incomplete. The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the statute of limitations for the appeal had commenced when the decision was served, even if the formal requirements for the service were not fully met, because the appellant clearly had actual knowledge of the decision, thereby satisfying the purpose of the notification requirement.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal of Criminal Penalty Order Based on Incomplete Notification: The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the statute of limitations for the appeal had commenced when the decision was served, even if the formal requirements for the service were not fully met, because the appellant clearly had actual knowledge of the decision, thereby satisfying the purpose of the notification requirement.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
termine di prescrizione sanzione penale notificazione della decisione ritardo ingiustificato dell'azione penale controllo della commisurazione della pena autorizzazione all’esecuzione Feststellung der Rechtskraft (Strafbefehl) | Strassenverkehrsrecht
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2022 101
Appeal Regarding Finality of Untimely Penalty Order
BEK 2018 171
Appeal Against Finality of Criminal Penalty Order
BEK 2019 8
Appeal Regarding Timeliness of Objection to Criminal Penalty Order Service
BEK 2023 139
Prosecutor v. Defendant on Timeliness of Penalty Order Objection
BEK 2025 54
Appeal Dismissed Due to Untimely Objection to Criminal Penalty Order

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Verfügung vom 18. September 2018 \n BEK 2018 103 \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident Dr. Reto Heizmann. |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigter und Beschwerdeführer, gegen Staatsanwaltschaft Innerschwyz, Postfach 562, Schmiedgasse 21, 6431 Schwyz, Strafverfolgungsbehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwältin B.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Feststellung der Rechtskraft (Strafbefehl) |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung der Staatsanwaltschaft Innerschwyz vom 15. Juni 2018, SUI 2018 94);- \n \n \n \n hat der Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident, \n