Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2017 88 • KG SZ BEK 2017 88 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Prosecutor's Decision to Discontinue Criminal Proceedings

Numero d'incarto BEK 2017 88
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A private claimant appealed a prosecutor's decision to discontinue proceedings regarding several criminal investigations, seeking to overturn the discontinuation order in a second instance review. The court examined the appeal against the prosecutor's ruling, which had terminated the investigations, and ultimately upheld the discontinuation because the evidence presented did not meet the threshold required to justify proceeding to trial, thereby affirming the prosecutor's original decision to not press charges.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Prosecutor's Decision to Discontinue Criminal Proceedings: The court examined the appeal against the prosecutor's ruling, which had terminated the investigations, and ultimately upheld the discontinuation because the evidence presented did not meet the threshold required to justify proceeding to trial, thereby affirming the prosecutor's original decision to not press charges.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
abbandono del procedimento inchiesta penale ricusazione del pubblico ministero ritiro della querela penale procedura disciplinare degli avvocati sindacato giurisdizionale
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2021 85
Appeal of Decision to Discontinue Criminal Proceedings
BEK 2021 109
Appeal Against Decision to Discontinue Criminal Proceedings
BEK 2024 201
Appeal Against Discontinuation of Criminal Proceedings
BEK 2022 184
Appeal of Discontinuation of Criminal Proceedings
BEK 2025 21
Appeal of Prosecutor's Decision to Discontinue Criminal Proceedings

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n Beschluss vom 21. Juli 2017 \n BEK 2017 88 \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident Dr. Reto Heizmann, Kantonsrichter Clara Betschart und Josef Reichlin, Gerichtsschreiber lic. iur. Mathis Bösch. |\n

\n\n

\n \n

\n\n| | | |\n In Sachen |\n A.________, \n Privatkläger und Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Einstellung / Nichtanhandnahme (2. Rechtsgang) |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung der kantonalen Staatsanwaltschaft vom 16. Februar 2016, SUB 2013 145 und 146 sowie SUB 2014 487, 488, 489, 490, 492);-

\n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: