Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2017 80 • KG SZ BEK 2017 80 Generato dall'IA

Prosecutorial Appointment of Defense Counsel Premature

Numero d'incarto BEK 2017 80
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The appellate court reviewed a defendant's appeal against a decision by the cantonal prosecutor's office concerning a charge of defamation, specifically challenging the appointment of official defense counsel. The court determined that the initial prosecutor's decision to appoint counsel was procedurally flawed because the defendant had not yet been formally charged or indicted at the time the appointment was made, thus concluding that the decision was premature and lacked a necessary legal basis at that stage.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Prosecutorial Appointment of Defense Counsel Premature: The court determined that the initial prosecutor's decision to appoint counsel was procedurally flawed because the defendant had not yet been formally charged or indicted at the time the appointment was made, thus concluding that the decision was premature and lacked a necessary legal basis at that stage.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
nomina del difensore ritardo del ministero pubblico diffamazione procedura disciplinare degli avvocati ricusazione di pubblici ministeri promozione dell'accusa penale üble Nachrede, amtliche Verteidigung | UP/amtliche Verteidigung
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2022 114
Defendant v. Prosecutor on Appointment of Defense Counsel
BEK 2018 168
Appeal Against Denial of Official Defense Counsel
BEK 2018 52
Appeal Regarding Denial of Official Defense Counsel
BEK 2017 58
Appellant v. Cantonal Prosecutor's Office (Mandatory Defense Counsel Appointment)
BEK 2022 115
Mootness of Appeal Regarding Defense Counsel Appointment After Indictment

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Beschluss vom 13. November 2017 \n BEK 2017 80 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Dr. Urs Tschümperlin, Kantonsrichter Clara Betschart und Josef Reichlin, a.o. Gerichtsschreiber MLaw Alessandro Glogg. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigter und Beschwerdeführer, gegen Kantonale Staatsanwaltschaft, Postfach 75, Sicherheitsstützpunkt Biber-brugg, 8836 Bennau, Strafverfolgungsbehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwältin B.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n üble Nachrede, amtliche Verteidigung |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung der Staatsanwaltschaft Innerschwyz vom 4. Mai 2017, SUI 2017 1368);- \n \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: