Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2017 78 • KG SZ BEK 2017 78 Generato dall'IA

Speeding Conviction Affirmed Due to Reliable Speed Measurement

Numero d'incarto BEK 2017 78
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A defendant appealed a conviction for exceeding the speed limit, challenging the lower court's assessment of the evidence regarding the speed measurement used to establish the offense. The appellate court reviewed the evidence, including the calibration and accuracy of the speed measuring device, and ultimately upheld the lower court's finding that the measured speed was reliably established, thereby affirming the conviction for the traffic violation.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Speeding Conviction Affirmed Due to Reliable Speed Measurement: The appellate court reviewed the evidence, including the calibration and accuracy of the speed measuring device, and ultimately upheld the lower court's finding that the measured speed was reliably established, thereby affirming the conviction for the traffic violation.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
superamento del limite di velocità valutazione delle prove fissazione della multa dubbio ragionevole abbandono del procedimento per infrazione stradale opportunità di una misura SVG, Überschreiten der Höchstgeschwindigkeit | Strassenverkehrsrecht
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2018 48
Speeding Conviction Upheld on Radar Evidence Reliability
BEK 2018 77
Speeding Conviction Upheld Despite Challenge to Measurement Device Accuracy
STK 2016 51
Speed Limit Violation Calibration Challenge Appeal
BEK 2016 178
Speeding Violation Appeal Upheld
BEK 2021 132
Speeding Conviction Affirmation Appeal

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Urteil vom 2. Januar 2018 \n BEK 2017 78 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident Dr. Reto Heizmann, Kantonsrichter Clara Betschart und Josef Reichlin, Gerichtsschreiberin lic. iur. Gabriela Thurnherr. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigter und Berufungsführer, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen Staatsanwaltschaft March, Postfach 162, Rathausplatz 1, 8853 Lachen, Anklagebehörde und Berufungsgegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwältin C.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n SVG, Überschreiten der Höchstgeschwindigkeit |\n \n\n

\n (Berufung gegen das Urteil des Einzelrichters am Bezirksgericht March vom 22. März 2017, SEO 2016 26);- \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: