BEK 2017 75 • KG SZ BEK 2017 75 Generato dall'IA

Challenge to Search and Seizure Order Legality

Numero d'incarto BEK 2017 75

Autorità giudiziaria Kantonsgericht · Beschwerdekammer

Giurisdizione

Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)

Data della decisione 2017-05-30

Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involves a challenge by the accused against an order for search and seizure issued by the public prosecutor's office. The court, after consideration, addressed the legality of the seizure order which was the subject of the appeal. The court's reasoning for its ultimate decision, which upheld or overturned the initial order, would be based on whether the procedural and substantive requirements for issuing such an intrusive measure were met under the applicable law regarding the justification and scope of the search and seizure.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Challenge to Search and Seizure Order Legality: The court, after consideration, addressed the legality of the seizure order which was the subject of the appeal. The court's reasoning for its ultimate decision, which upheld or overturned the initial order, would be based on whether the procedural and substantive requirements for issuing such an intrusive measure were met under the applicable law regarding the justification and scope of the search and seizure.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA

ordine del pignoramento perquisizione portata della legge del contratto richiesta di pignoramento diritto di essere arrestato illecita violenza Beschlagnahme | Zwangsmassnahmen/Beschlagnahme

Generato dall'IA

BEK 2018 72

Public Prosecutor v. Appellant: Legality of Search and Seizure

BEK 2018 95

Public Prosecutor's Authority to Issue Search and Seizure Orders

BEK 2024 206

Appeal Against Prosecutor's Seizure Order

BEK 2023 52

Appeal of Property Seizure Order

BEK 2019 121

Complainant v. State Prosecutor (Search and Seizure Justification)