Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
BEK 2017 70 • KG SZ BEK 2017 70 Generato dall'IA

Appeal of Definitive Authorization for Debt Enforcement

Numero d'incarto BEK 2017 70
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The matter concerns an appeal against a lower court's decision granting definitive legal authorization for debt enforcement, initiated by the party against whom enforcement was sought. The court reviewed the appeal concerning the definitive authorization of debt collection proceedings, and in its reasoning, considered the established facts and applicable law to determine whether the initial decision to grant definitive legal authorization was correctly rendered.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal of Definitive Authorization for Debt Enforcement: The court reviewed the appeal concerning the definitive authorization of debt collection proceedings, and in its reasoning, considered the established facts and applicable law to determine whether the initial decision to grant definitive legal authorization was correctly rendered.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
esecuzione per debiti decisione motivata eccezione di incostituzionalità rinvio pregiudiziale ricorso per annullamento nel diritto dell'Unione autorizzazione ad agire definitive Rechtsöffnung (EGV-SZ 2017 A 6.3) | Rechtsöffnung definitive
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Beschluss vom 19. Dezember 2017 \n BEK 2017 70 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin lic. iur. Daniela Pérez-Steiner, Kantonsrichter Clara Betschart und Josef Reichlin, Gerichtsschreiber lic. iur. Mathis Bösch, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin MLaw Deborah Basso. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Gesuchsgegner und Beschwerdeführer, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen C.________, Gesuchstellerin und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt D.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n definitive Rechtsöffnung |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung des Einzelrichters am Bezirksgericht Höfe vom 30. März 2017, ZES 2016 673);- \n \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: