Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
BEK 2017 7 • KG SZ BEK 2017 7 Generato dall'IA

Debt Enforcement Appeal Dismissed Over Unconditional Acknowledgment

Numero d'incarto BEK 2017 7
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A lower court granted definitive legal remedy in favor of the requesting party concerning a debt enforcement matter, which the opposing party appealed, arguing that the underlying acknowledgment of debt was conditional and thus not suitable for definitive legal remedy. The appellate court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the document presented established an unconditional and undisputed debt based on a signed contractual agreement, satisfying the requirements for definitive legal remedy under the relevant enforcement law despite the appellant's unsubstantiated claims of subsequent conditions.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Debt Enforcement Appeal Dismissed Over Unconditional Acknowledgment: The appellate court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the document presented established an unconditional and undisputed debt based on a signed contractual agreement, satisfying the requirements for definitive legal remedy under the relevant enforcement law despite the appellant's unsubstantiated claims of subsequent conditions.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
riconoscimento di debito credito in esecuzione esecuzione revoca del fallimento contratto di credito al consumo violazione positiva del contratto definitive Rechtsöffnung | Rechtsöffnung definitive
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Beschluss vom 30. Mai 2017 \n BEK 2017 7 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Dr. Urs Tschümperlin, Kantonsrichter Josef Reichlin und Hannelore Räber, Gerichtsschreiberin lic. iur. Cornelia Spörri-Kessler. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n In Sachen |\n A.________, \n Gesuchsgegner und Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n definitive Rechtsöffnung (Betr. Nr. zz) |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung des Einzelrichters am Bezirksgericht March vom 9. November 2016, ZES 2016 471);-

\n \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: